fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Porsche tops initial quality survey - AGAIN

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPorsche tops initial quality survey - AGAIN

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...ity-rankings/1

POST 2Original post

Well Porsche toped quality for the last few years but what about our 996 model range? I'm sure we were bottom of the bucket as far as materials used in the beginning 996 line.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 7665576

From 2003: http://money.cnn.com/2003/07/08/pf/a...lity/index.htm We scored even better on LONG TERM quality

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

And the 'lowly early 996': here's the 2000 results: J.D. Power and Associates 2000 Vehicle Dependability Study(SM) 2000 Nameplate Ranking Problems Per 100 Vehicles 0 100 200 300 400 500 Lexus..................................216 Porsche.................................220 Infiniti..................................245 Toyota.......................................299 Acura............................................304 Jaguar............................................308 Mercedes-Benz.....................................308 Honda..............................................318 Lincoln.............................................337 Buick................................................340 Cadillac..............................................361 BMW....................................................377 Oldsmobile..............................................380 Subaru...................................................381 Audi......................................................390 Saturn......................................................410 Mercury......................................................412 Geo...........................................................415 Nissan.........................................................419 Mazda...........................................................438 Ford.............................................................443 TOTAL INDUSTRY....................................................448 Finishing below industry average, in alphabetical order, are: Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Eagle, GMC, Hyundai, Isuzu, Jeep, Kia, Land Rover, Mitsubishi, Plymouth, Pontiac, Saab, Suzuki, Volvo, Volkswagen.

POST 5Original post

Did anyone else notice that there are 59! vehicles that can claim best in class in initial quality. I wonder who pays for these ratings.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ahem - TIM - Where are YOU! We have a newbie with this as his first post with NOTHING in his profile or picture!!! No introduction even!!

POST 7Original post

I'm still hurting and in a funk from Dharn's admission that he has been on here for 4.5 years and hasn't posted a pic of his car! Bawhahahahah!!!!

POST 8Original post

I believe JD Power practically sells their awards to every manufacturer. To increase their inventory, there are so many different qualifications to multiply a given award. So you will have "Highest ranking in Initial Quality Survey (for USDM 4-door hatchback automobiles assembled in Mexico with full-sized spare tire, etc. etc.) " and about 58 more of those. Hello everyone. Joining the bandwagon with fellow newbie Zelpdsm. I have an '04 C4S coupe with a loud button. Will figure out best way to post pics soon.

POST 9Original post

OK, I get two Newbies with one stone! It is customary for Newbies to introduce themselves, tell us a little about their car and, most importantly, post pics of their car. So consider this your "Newbie Initiation!" Come on, Newbies, post the @#$%^&* pics! Oh yeah, I almost forgot..... Welcome to Rennlist!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.