I think the content is pretty lame. Not much depth to the one I read (the RS vs GT3 issue). It seems like they did their research on the internet and road tests over a five mile run. Style over content if you ask me. I have Evo on subscrption, buy Autocar when it's interesting, and 911&PW when I remember. That does it for me. Those guys know their sh!t.
What do you think of GT/Purely Porsche - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Add to repair workspace
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat do you think of GT/Purely Porsche - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My missus is more of a 911&PW purchaser than me, I just come home once a month and there's a copy on the table, and she cooks - bonus! (ps: I do come home more than once a month actually but only that often to a new mag)
If you like pictures I suppose it's OK even then books are better Otherwise it's inaccurate, shallow, . . . . .
This month's buying guide for 964 and 993 RS's was crap. A real missed opportunity. No depth at all. Same goes for the RUF 3400 S. Great car, crap article. If the Evo writers tried the same, it would be in a different league.
Any reason why they couldn't expand the GT part of the equation?
Do you think the magazine is too narrow in focus? Do you think they should be a little more GT?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
