fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Some are born great: A. Frankel The Sunday Times

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
2 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSome are born great: A. Frankel The Sunday Times

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

<span class="headline">Porsche Cayman S[/quote] <span class="byline">By Andrew Frankel of The Sunday Times[/quote] <span class="standfirst"> Some are born great [/quote] <span class="standfirst"> http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,12929-1815688,00.html [/quote] <span class="standfirst">One of very few criticisms I have of this new £43,930 Cayman S (think Boxster coupé with more power) is that it lacks a limited slip differential, a device that improves grip, particularly traction. When I asked at the press conference why this was missing, the car’s chief chassis developer said simply: “The car needs it, but marketing says it cannot have it.” Why not? Because if it did it would be quicker cross-country than the Porsche 911, a car more expensive to the tune of £15,000. [/quote] <span class="standfirst"> [/quote]

POST 2Original post

I think the stars and planets are aligning on this car. Based on everything we've seen and heard out of the press and Porsche, this could be one of those once a quarter century cars that define the segment they're in. It would seem that the structural rigidity of the Cyaman has made the difference, it's allowed the engineers to tweak the suspension a bit firmer and that, in turn, has increased steering feeedback. One of the issues with a major competitior, the C6 Corvette, is that the steering feel is a bit numb (thanks to GM's insistence on using 'Magnasteer' - all the effort and none of the feel of a manual rack ; -). And steering feel is something that's critical in my shooping list of car attributes. MotorSport had an interview with Rick Mears in the 10/05 issue. In it he says, regarding the Penske PC15, 'I've always been a feel driver, not a reflex driver, and that car was absolutely numb. A beautiful car, meticulous design work and fit and finish, but it was just numb.' While I doubt that anyone whose driven a C6 'vette would say it's 'just numb', I'm suspecting that the Cayman S would be the pick of those wanting high volumes of feedback from the vehicle. In R&T's 3/05 feature titled, 'Best All-around Sports Car' , the Boxster was the price independent favorite of the group, the Corvette the price dependent pick (value pick). I wonder what it would have been if a Cayman S had been available.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.