fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Club GB

Anyone good at valuations?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAnyone good at valuations?

Reported or suspected cause

shade more than i thought at

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

Probably a shade more than I thought at that.

Original post Read captured discussion
Anyone good at valuations?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'shade more than i thought at' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'shade more than i thought at' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

shade more than i thought at

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

Probably a shade more than I thought at that.

Original post Read captured discussion
Anyone good at valuations?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

Time will tell I suppose...still not sure I can bear to see it go!

Original post Read captured discussion

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Folks, Any ideas what my C4S is worth, as I'm toying with the idea of getting rid? December 2004, Full OPC history, Extended Warranty, 16500 miles, Speed Yellow, Aerokit, GT3 style wheels, Lowered Chassis, Sports Exhaust, Sunroof, Sat Nav, Phone kit, CD Changer, Lowered Seats, Thick Rim 'wheel, Short Shift, Litronics and numerous other bits I forget... Any ideas on what sort of ballpark I should be looking at? Thanks in advance, Glen.

POST 2Original post

Wow! Lovely example... £33 > 34K I think would be suitable.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Cheers Paul.. Probably a shade more than I thought at that. Time will tell I suppose...still not sure I can bear to see it go!

POST 4Original post

Taking a look at it, yellow seems to be priced higher. Ones with 20,000 miles are selling at £34K from a dealer, but, since yours still has the extended warranty, I reckon the price could be up there with the others...

POST 5Original post

Stick your details in www.webuyanycar.com At least it will give you some idea. Not suggesting you should sell it to them though !

POST 6Original post

don't bother with we buy any car - the suggested price for mine was 5k below what i got trading it in!!! Details of the new one to follow soon.......

POST 7Original post

I you wait a week they give you a much improved price

POST 8Original post

wait 4 months and they give you 5k more[ ](seriously!!)

POST 9Original post

Well its three weeks now since i tried them and still no improved price!

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Heh-heh! Not that I'm aware of... I just tried that 'Webuyanycar' lot and they suggest £30500! So I suppose early £30ks is the right ball-park.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.