15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHC4s front bumper on C2?
Leading reported evidence
Replace from red
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have a picture of a 996rs with colour changed from red to green and it looks awesome.
Leading evidence: 'Replace from red' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace from red' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Does anyone know if it will fit a 996.2 C2.
I'm sure I read somewhere it's just bolt on but want to be sure. I much prefer it to the C2 aero front I've got now.
I did think that myself. Just wondered if anyone had fitted one. I'm thinking c4s front bumper, 996 GT3 RS rear bootlid/wing and 911r white with green livery. With my 991 wheels I'm thinking it would look fresh but in keeping with the 996 era.
Any opinions are very welcome. :thumb:
My car is white so with new engine cover/spoiler and front bumper will need some paint. The 911r type scheme looks so fresh. I don't want to make my 996 look like something else though. I want to retain the essence of 996. Nothing worse than trying to make a 996 look like a 997 etc.
I saw a post on this before. The bumper fits no problem but I think you also need the C4S crash bar as the C2 one is too long to allow it to fit. Also if you have a third radiator like an X51 or tip you will need the turbo centre grille or turbo bumper.
I am not sure what you mean by too long. The crash bar on my car looked like all the others i have seen, do you have any pictures to show the difference?
Here is the parts diagram of the narrow body and wide front. part 5 on the narrow body and part 18 on the wide body. you can see the narrow body extends further. Same if you look up the part numbers on design 911.
