10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTime to say good bye and thank you...
Leading reported evidence
Recommend 996 as the first p car
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'm for sure going to miss her and would defo recommend a 996 as the first P car.
Leading evidence: 'Recommend 996 as the first p car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend 996 as the first p car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So, the day has almost come where it's time for me to say good bye to my beloved 02.2002 996 C4S which has given me so much joy over the past 4 years of ownership. Yes, I have had some worries and partly sleepless nights but in the end the enjoyment sitting behind the steering wheel on my Sunday drives in the Alps weighed up for it.
What can I say other than what a great introduction to Porsche 911 ownership. I'm for sure going to miss her and would defo recommend a 996 as the first P car.
So, this is not going to be the end of my 911 ownership as I'm moving on to the 997 gen 2 and still staying true to the C4S line...
Thank you all for your input and especially help just as I was buying my first 911 back at the beginning of 2013.
They still let you hang out in here you know. The 997 guys are a different breed. Mostly questions about detailing (who knows a good shop?) and "Where exactly is my engine?" questions...
Congrats on the move...997.2 C4S is a good move. Its a perfect everyday car. Love mine and Frankly very little to complain about. As far as 996 vs 997 crowd, I enjoy both and learn a lot.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/480x247/whyeddie_95459f410074796ae9d58677ae5418f1bd496933.gif
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
