fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

911 turbo vs z06

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
18 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH911 turbo vs z06

Leading reported evidence

Run with one

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Ran with one on track a few years back - very fast car, but when his engine blew at 155...it was all she wrote for that car.

911 turbo vs z06
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run with one' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run with one' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 18 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run with one

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Ran with one on track a few years back - very fast car, but when his engine blew at 155...it was all she wrote for that car.

911 turbo vs z06
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T060112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Will the 2010 911 TURBO PDK beat the current z06 from a roll? Because the old 911 turbo lost from highway rolls and dead stop.

POST 2Original post

Think the original assumption is wrong... As proven by the best motoring guys: Note the title has it wrong, its ZO6 vs. original 997 turbo tip

POST 3Original post

I know from experience that if you punch the throttle of a Z06 in 1st gear it'll break the rear tires loose. The Turbo is AWD, and won't. So I would bet on the Turbo every time to win on a roll. The most recent issue of Car & Drivel pits a 2010 Turbo against a ZR1, which is quicker than a Z06, and the Turbo out-accelerated the ZR1 through the quarter mile and on a roll. Once you get above a certain power level RWD doesn't seem to be enough to translate the power to motion efficiently.

POST 4Original post

Another interesting shootout. Porsche 911 Turbo| V8 | Supercar|

POST 5Original post

Yeah, that latest issue of Car and Driver has the Porsche 911 turbo at 0-60 in 2.9s and 11 flat in the quarter - unbelievable!! To my knowledge there are only two cars quicker to 60 and that would be the Bugatti Veyron and SSC Ultimate Aero - kind of elite company.

POST 6Original post

Thanks to PDK with launch control and all wheel drive (yea the 500 ponies helps too)! To be honest the straight line numbers are nice but I prefer the balance and refinement.

POST 7Original post

I've owned a Corvette. I have a 2010 911 Turbo. I have had several Corvettes, Ferraris and a Lambo up against me on a track from a start. I'm unbeaten! There is nothing like the 2010 911 Turbo. The quality of the 911 is far superior in every way. I wish I had never wasted money on an inferior Corvette. Fortunately I sold it off!

POST 8Original post

Was that a $150,000 Corvette? You have to admit that for the price, a Z06 is a heck of a lot of performance.

POST 9Original post

I owned a new C5 for 24 months. When I turned it in I counted 22 Shop tickets where I had to bring it in for repair. what a lemon. Have not had a single problem with my 2008 C2S.

POST 10Original post

No doubt 911, i love the way muscle car swings and drifts but it wont come close to the 911 grip and sprint.

POST 11Original post

Assuming your time is worth something... ...that cuts into that "bang for your buck" argument a bit.

POST 13Original post

the current turbo can beat the Zr1 0-60 and 1/4 miile with the stick shift...lol http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJx85diM3IE

POST 14Original post

The current 997T strenght is it's ungodly off-the-line acceleration. In person these cars look like Top Fuelers in the way they 'launch' ....

POST 15Original post

I owned a C6 Z06 for a while. Ungodly fast but very unsophisticated. It was fun for a couple of months but I yearned for something that gave feedback. Quite happy with the CS. All the media reports I've seen agree with prior posters: 997tt is faster than the Z06.

POST 16Original post

Ran with one on track a few years back - very fast car, but when his engine blew at 155...it was all she wrote for that car. Kwality with a K.

POST 17Original post

I love both Corvettes and Porsches. But what everyone forgot to mention, was the ZR1, yet slower to 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile. The ZR1 is faster on the track!!!! WOW!! times have changed. It has always been that the Vette would be faster and the Porsche better handling and out did the Vette at the track. Now the #'s have changed.

POST 18Original post

Porsche knows the mid-engine platform is the fastest around the track, followed by front engine. Economics and Tradition keeps the obsolete rear engine platform in production. Cheers

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.