fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Has anyone noticed the new 911 photos?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHas anyone noticed the new 911 photos?

Leading reported evidence

Use help

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If that's intended to actually disguise something they could use our help.

Has anyone noticed the new 911 photos?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use help' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use help' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use help

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If that's intended to actually disguise something they could use our help.

Has anyone noticed the new 911 photos?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I've been studying the photos from the UK pub auto express, the one that has the shots of the next 911 stuck in the snow. I wasn't sure the first time I saw it, so went through each photo slowly. The side intakes in front of the hind wheels are painted on. As you look carefully, you see they have no depth. It's a trompe-le-oi kind of thing. I hope I spelled that correctly. OR is it all a dream? Rick 991 Porsche 911 Side Pictures | Auto Express

POST 2Original post

Still camouflaged but looks nice... my interest is the mechanical side of the 991 and its interior. I believe the intakes are fake as per all the shots I saw previously. Porsche could be doing radical changes to its production line. The exterior is the least of my concerns at this stage. Yet, thank you for the pictures... it looks nice!

POST 3Original post

Your observation seems to be right on. If that's intended to actually disguise something they could use our help.

POST 4Original post

"Trompe l'oeil" And a good example of it at that. Well spotted. Just trying to make it look like a Turbo...throw automotive journos off the scent.

POST 5Original post

I found a video of this car. Decent 480 p quality. Sometimes the intakes appear to be real, then you'll see a sequence where you clearly see that they are painted on, with no real depth. At 1:22 of the sequence, I think that's a Boxter in front of the 911. If it is, it's much larger than previously. YouTube - Next Gen 2012 Porsche 911 winter testing

POST 6Original post

The front headlights seem flatter or a little bit more setback or maybe the bumper is more extended.

POST 7Original post

Maybe the fake scoops are there to disguise the lengthened wheelbase? Isn't the part of the car from the rear of the door to the front of the rear fender longer?

POST 8Original post

This is to comply with new European safety standards.

POST 9Original post

New daylight photos. Looks like the same car pretty much. You can see the painted on intakes on the flanks much clearer now 2012 Porsche 911 Cabriolet Front Pictures | Auto Express

POST 10Original post

Porsche always does that btw... On all previous 911 mules as well!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.