17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 turbo
Leading reported evidence
Test drive
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Found them: [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=645623&mpage=1&key=rsj%F2%9D%AF%BD]Initial thoughts[/link] [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=667594&mpage=1&key=RSJ򢿊]Follow up[/link] IIRC RSJ do not allow potential customer test drives but will allow a Peter Morgan inspection with test drive.
Leading evidence: 'Test drive' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drive' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Found them: [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=645623&mpage=1&key=rsj%F2%9D%AF%BD]Initial thoughts[/link] [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=667594&mpage=1&key=RSJ򢿊]Follow up[/link] IIRC RSJ do not allow potential customer test drives but will allow a Peter Morgan inspection with test drive.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Test drive
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Found them: [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=645623&mpage=1&key=rsj%F2%9D%AF%BD]Initial thoughts[/link] [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=667594&mpage=1&key=RSJ򢿊]Follow up[/link] IIRC RSJ do not allow potential customer test drives but will allow a Peter Morgan inspection with test drive.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Found them: [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=645623&mpage=1&key=rsj%F2%9D%AF%BD]Initial thoughts[/link] [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=667594&mpage=1&key=RSJ򢿊]Follow up[/link] IIRC RSJ do not allow potential customer test drives but will allow a Peter Morgan inspection with test drive.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
i'm thinking about buying a 996 turbo, and would welcome comments whether it should be a coupe or cabrio. my preference is the ragtop, but i'm not sure how solid the car will feel, and whether there are other considerations. i've had a variety of Porsches, but never a convertible. many thanks
Personaly although softtops look nice, I think you suffer greatly from the loss of the roof. I tried and noticed a huge difference I would definetly try before you buy!
The hardtop is pretty noisy (and I generally don't mind noise) and the cab (with roof up) is very noisy on the motorway. If you're only going to use it in the summer with the roof down, no probs though.
If you think the 996 Turbo Coupe is fast, try driving at the same speed with the roof down in the Cabriolet! The open top makes it feel twice as fast!! Get a wind deflector though and go for the heated seat option if you can find one. With those two accessories you can drive topless any time of year.
During my search I drove all body types and decided on a coupe because they felt tighter. I found that Targas were prone to rattles and cabriolets were much less predictable in handling. The first 996 I drove was a Turbo Cab and while it felt good, I quickly realised it didn't feel as good as a car with a proper roof. Regards
I agree with the comments re handling and scuttle movement/rattle, rear seats are compromised too. Whilst I like open top motoring the Turbo coupe feels much more of a driver's car to me and I don't think the roof lines of the cab (up or down) are as nice but looks are subjective.
Although there is a bit of body flex with the cabrio, and the backrest of the rear seats are vertical rather than slightly reclined, it isn't so significant that that should stop you from getting a cabriolet. If you value driving purity more than open top motoring then go for the coupe. If you're not that bothered the cab is really nice to have.
Unfortunately not. The rigidity or stiffness of the Coupe body shell is due to the monocoque construction where the roof is an integral part, effectively forming a rigid cage. Cutting the roof off causes a significant loss to rigidity with the body effectively becoming a ladder chassis. Ladder chassis are poor at controlling twist, eg if you jack up single wheel on an MGB you cannot open/close the doors. Welding in more metal to strengthen the chassis improves the situation but this is never quite as good as a monocoque and adds more weight. Hence the cab being heavier than the coupe, Fitting a hard top does not add significantly to stiffness as it is only clipped on rather than being a integral part of the shell. In fact driving in a cab with a hard top you are most likely to notice scuttle shake. Look for movement between the body and the hard top on bumpy twisty roads. This is why there is a clearance fit between the two in vulnerable areas to prevent rub damage. Personally I think a cab with a removable hard top doesn't look as good as just having the soft top, the lines are awkward and disjointed. Of course IMO the coupe has the best lines of all but then I am rather biased....
comments appreciated. obviously i need to try both, although that might be a little tricky. lots of coupes about, fewer cabs. the price of both seems to be dropping, or at least cars are not selling if they seem at all expensive. i doubt if that will change in the forseeable future as there's not much cash around. any views on the specialists like JZM or RSJ?
I bought mine from Joel at RSJ. I found that the prices matched the service I received. The car was not cheap, I paid top book for it but it is a very nice car and the post-sale service was the best I have experienced. I posted an initial thoughts thread on the forum with a three month followup, try searching for RSJ; they should come up. Good luck and keep us informed!
Found them: [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=645623&mpage=1&key=rsj%F2%9D%AF%BD]Initial thoughts[/link] [link=http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=667594&mpage=1&key=RSJ򢿊]Follow up[/link] IIRC RSJ do not allow potential customer test drives but will allow a Peter Morgan inspection with test drive. I suggest you drive a few private cars, even try hiring; there used to be a company who hire 996 cars on eBay. HTH
I agree with Boggie and I too prefer coupes to cabriolets (in any type of car). However, if you want a cabriolet then buy one. Its still a great car and I suspect that you could forgive a good one almost anything.