12 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGAP for a car over £125k - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Replace from a %
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In some cases this commission will change from a % to a flat fee, decreasing the incentive for sales people to keep the price high.
GAP for a car over £125k - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace from a %' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace from a %' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Admiral fulfils the requirements set by the FCA on what constitutes a fair market value and as such the GAP insurers have to comply with their side of the offering.
GAP for a car over £125k - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Set by the fca
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Admiral fulfils the requirements set by the FCA on what constitutes a fair market value and as such the GAP insurers have to comply with their side of the offering.
GAP for a car over £125k - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have deleted my initial message from this topic.
Just seen FCA have imposed a pause of the market, so disregard this.
Edited by Ki5h on Tuesday 14th May 14:36
Gnevans said:
I thought the FCA had effectively banned it.
They have paused all selling ( from the 30th April )and banned dealers themselves from selling it.
ALA as a specialist provider is supposedly cautiously optimistic about the pause being lifted for them and presumably other specialist providers over the next 2-4 weeks apparently.
"This action follows findings in the FCA’s latest fair value measures data, which shows that only 6% of the amount customers pay in premiums for GAP insurance is paid out in claims.
"The FCA has seen examples of some firms paying out 70% of the value of insurance premiums in commission to parties involved in selling GAP policies."
Lovely people.
Panamax said:
"This action follows findings in the FCA’s latest fair value measures data, which shows that only 6% of the amount customers pay in premiums for GAP insurance is paid out in claims.
"The FCA has seen examples of some firms paying out 70% of the value of insurance premiums in commission to parties involved in selling GAP policies."
Lovely people.
Indeed but tarring all of the providers with the some brush with the resultant effect that customers aren’t able to protect their potential loss is hardly treating customers fairly.
I guess that’s why the specialist providers ( and not the dealers ) are cautiously optimistic that the pause for them will be lifted.
I bought GAP insurance for my 991.2 GT3 a year ago. Cost about £300 for 3 years through rivierainsurance as a backup to the Admiral main policy for the car as I had doubts about the value Admiral would place on the car in the event of a total write off. This combined insurance was still cheaper than the next cheapest quote I got for a main policy.
GAP Insurance sales can resume from the 1st July (the FCA have said that they can, it doesn't mean that they will, or that all providers will).
In some cases providers are looking to lower prices and decrease commission paid to introducers (e.g. dealers). In some cases this commission will change from a % to a flat fee, decreasing the incentive for sales people to keep the price high.
If I were buying now I'd be tempted to wait until July...
Source: I work in online car sales
Doddler said:
I bought GAP insurance for my 991.2 GT3 a year ago. Cost about £300 for 3 years through rivierainsurance as a backup to the Admiral main policy for the car as I had doubts about the value Admiral would place on the car in the event of a total write off. This combined insurance was still cheaper than the next cheapest quote I got for a main policy.
I think you need to read your t’s and c’s properly if you think GAP is there to top up a below-par total loss valuation. The GAP / RTI insurer usually insists on a ‘fair’ value before they will look at settling the claim. They certainly won’t pay out more than they need to where they feel the primary insurer has under-valued a vehicle.
HoneyBadgerUK said:
GAP Insurance sales can resume from the 1st July (the FCA have said that they can, it doesn't mean that they will, or that all providers will).
In some cases providers are looking to lower prices and decrease commission paid to introducers (e.g. dealers). In some cases this commission will change from a % to a flat fee, decreasing the incentive for sales people to keep the price high.
If I were buying now I'd be tempted to wait until July...
Source: I work in online car sales
How long after new car purchase can you buy GAP?
Nickarcher82 said:
How long after new car purchase can you buy GAP?
Typically up to 90 - 180 days for a used car (depending on GAP type, like back to invoice or vehicle replacement), and up to a year for a new car.
On Friday ALA weren't quoting for GAP, looks like today they are, so it could be that providers have taken the FCA's guidance as a green light to sell (the 'block' on GAP sales was always voluntary as requested by the FCA, never an official ban)
Edited by HoneyBadgerUK on Saturday 25th May 19:12
bencollins4 said:
Doddler said:
I bought GAP insurance for my 991.2 GT3 a year ago. Cost about £300 for 3 years through rivierainsurance as a backup to the Admiral main policy for the car as I had doubts about the value Admiral would place on the car in the event of a total write off. This combined insurance was still cheaper than the next cheapest quote I got for a main policy.
I think you need to read your t’s and c’s properly if you think GAP is there to top up a below-par total loss valuation. The GAP / RTI insurer usually insists on a ‘fair’ value before they will look at settling the claim. They certainly won’t pay out more than they need to where they feel the primary insurer has under-valued a vehicle.
If taking out GAP insurance, you would always take the RTI (return to invoice) policy.
If, 3 years down the something bad happens, the GAP insurance covers from what the value of your insurers deem as a fair price, to what you originally paid.
That's a no brainer.
bencollins4 said:
I think you need to read your t’s and c’s properly if you think GAP is there to top up a below-par total loss valuation. The GAP / RTI insurer usually insists on a ‘fair’ value before they will look at settling the claim. They certainly won’t pay out more than they need to where they feel the primary insurer has under-valued a vehicle.
Admiral fulfils the requirements set by the FCA on what constitutes a fair market value and as such the GAP insurers have to comply with their side of the offering.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.