fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Club GB

What do you think of this?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWhat do you think of this?

Leading reported evidence

Repair with great attention

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

by an insurance company due to rear end damage now repaired with great attention to detail.

What do you think of this?
Frequently discussed work

Inspect by a porsche specialist

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Then if you are reasonably happy get the car inspected by a Porsche specialist.

What do you think of this?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Repair with great attention' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect by a porsche specialist' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Inspect by a porsche specialist

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Then if you are reasonably happy get the car inspected by a Porsche specialist.

What do you think of this?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Inspect by a porsche specialist

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Then if you are reasonably happy get the car inspected by a Porsche specialist.

What do you think of this?

Repair with great attention

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

by an insurance company due to rear end damage now repaired with great attention to detail.

What do you think of this?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201150434761495/sort/priceasc/usedcars/include-non-classified/on/price-to/25000/price-from/18000/model/911_turbo/make/porsche/page/1/keywords/turbo/radius/1500/postcode/ox53eu?logcode=p cat d - so what and why. I like the colour and interior but not the 19s. Price - bit steep for a cat d? David

POST 2Original post

Add reads 2 Doors, Manual, Coupe, Petrol, 66,750 miles, Black. Manual, Red leather, Graphite 19" alloys, Trip computer, Air conditioning, Full service, new disc's all round. This vehical was categorized 'CAT D' by an insurance company due to rear end damage now repaired with great attention to detail. taxed & mot'd. Fantasic looking car. No offers priced to sell. No time waisters please. £18,500 ------------------- Priced to sell - well I don't think it will be finding a new owner for quite some time![ ]

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Come on John don't be coy. Why not?

POST 4Original post

I think I read somewhere that, generally speaking, CAT D prices are around 2/3 of the equivalent non-CAT D. So about 2/3 of £22000 if it is immaculate - £15000? I hate the wheels - they would have to go - at a cost of £1000 to exchange for genuine 18"? And it will always be a CAT D, and difficult to sell at any price, as it is such a limited market. If you can put up with that, it would be a decent buy at £13-14000 if it checks out otherwise.

POST 5Original post

When its been hit up the 'ice cream' no thanks - would sooner save have PPI on a car I fancied and then drive off with some peace of mind.

POST 6Original post

That's what I mean John - it is a very limited market. I wouldn't buy one either, but a few people do, and "save" themselves some money.

POST 7Original post

It worries me when i see...............no time waisters I could add the wheels and the red interior as for Cat D why bother there are so many good ones around this will always be Cat D, a pig to move on if you can,it is not as if this is the last word in 996 turbos

POST 9Original post

I think it is more about being able to buy a car they normally wouldn't be able to afford. You can see the logic in getting a 2002 Turbo for 2000 C2 money. I still wouldn't do it myself, but I can understand why people do. If you haven't got the budget for a 'good one' then it isn't an option.

POST 11Original post

Never worth it, you could buy a propper one for a couple of grand more.

POST 12Original post

Does the number plate read CROOK? Or am I just cynical?

POST 13Original post

I read it as CROOK and then when I saw CAT D I read it as CROCK [ ]

POST 14Original post

The price is about 25% of an equivalent undamaged one. You really need to see pictures of the damage and ideally the insurance report. Then if you are reasonably happy get the car inspected by a Porsche specialist. This will all take time and therefore dont understand the "no timewasters" comment!

POST 15Original post

Cat D is the lowest of the four categories of write off. However, it still means that the cost of repair was close to the market value at the time of the accident, hence it was economic to repair. I know about these things because our Land Rover slid on black ice last week and was a cat D write off. I chose to keep it as the damage was cosmetic and it's a Land Rover so I expect I will be able to sell it in the future and cover my costs. Cost to me was 35% of the payout value.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.