8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew wtee - how stringent are opc's being ?
Leading reported evidence
Run more aggressive pagid brake bads, will
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
if you run more aggressive Pagid brake bads, will that be used to cop out of wtee renewal as they're non-standard parts ?
Leading evidence: 'Run more aggressive pagid brake bads, will' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run more aggressive pagid brake bads, will' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So if sayyou run Toyo R888's the opc won't offer cover unless changing to N-spec....
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ok so technically nothing aftermarket is allowed, which i guess rules out obvious performance enhancing items, like exhausts, but does anyone have any experience of a new wtee being refused or accepted due to/despite more innocuous items, such as having a mobridge/denison ipod adapter or suspension items such as upgraded arb's or springs ?
Interested to hear feedback on what things have been declined/accepted.
another thought, are non N-rated tyres also being cited as being unacceptable to the new wtee ? So if sayyou run Toyo R888's the opc won't offer cover unless changing to N-spec....
At first OPC Mid Sussex said they couldn't put a warranty on my car because I had taken out the PCM1 and put a Kenwood unit in
They then saw sense and the car was covered.
I've had my renewal letter (up on the 20th December), which came recorded delivery and as such needed to be signed for! This came about 2 weeks ago.
It points out the cost + says the 111 point check is included.
Hopefully the dealer will see sense at renewal time....will find out on the 15th!
Cheers.
Oops, I could be in trouble, retro fit PCM2 (although I don't think that was covered by the old warranty anyway) - is it in the new one :?
My tyres are also N rated, and only half worn.
Seriously will be considering whether to renew come May when it's due........haven't had enough repairs completed (none in 18 months) and the only thing I got completed under warranty I had to fight for too, so not overly impressed.
Might put the money in a separate account for repairs in case they come and only have the servicing completed at the OPC.
"At first OPC Mid Sussex said they couldn't put a warranty on my car because I had taken out the PCM1 and put a Kenwood unit in They then saw sense and the car was covered."
Presumably, given that PCM is now covered under the wtee, they are actually better off renewing your car as its one less thing for them to deal with, as you now don't have PCM !!
It will be interesting to see how this pans out... if you run more aggressive Pagid brake bads, will that be used to cop out of wtee renewal as they're non-standard parts ? Frankly, if opc's have any shred of common sense, they'll use it, cuz continuall not renewing peoples wtees for trivial, non-covered items, will actually end up costing them a lot more money in future sales, servicing, reputation etc etc...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
