40 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSeal gray in low light
Leading reported evidence
Use lo-res jpeg
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I did a 2 minute PS hack job using the lo-res jpeg, but I'd do it something like this:
Leading evidence: 'Use lo-res jpeg' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use lo-res jpeg' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
40 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T225432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Pulled back into work after dinner and was struck by how different the car looked under the dim fluorescent glare of the parking garage lighting.
Thought I would share.
I know right... now when he sells it, it can't claim "it's NEVER seen rain".
So sad.
I mean, doesn't he know the engine could suck too much water through the air box and cause piston rust which leads to bore scoring and even IMS apocalyptic
meltdown? I hope this is the '99 model with proven dual row unicorn dingle bearings.
Hahaha. I took my Jeep to a Super Bowl party last night and when somebody asked if I had brought the Porsche I felt like one of those people when I quickly said without thinking "Not in the rain".
That's awesome.
We have another storm coming in this weekend... I'm hoping that's it for this season. Mud slides, sink holes, floods, road closures. This is getting ridiculous.
That reminds me I gotta see the glory hole while it's full! Heading up there right NOW.
Where is that big road wash out? Hopefully not between here and there. I'm thinking 101 > 37 > 121 >128 and then charge toward Pope Valley/Berryessa from there.
If history tells us anything we should be seeing this type of rain right on up through March and touching into April... at least that's what every Steinbeck book I ever read talked about.
😉
I too live here in NO CA and will say that our hwys are all screwed up due to these rains, large pot holes in all hyws, will not drive my car on any of them for awhile until they get them fixed. 680 and 880 are the worst.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1504/img_0137_e0e0d34335c2d71dfcd9fe8631c6a7ff30bdaec0.jpg
Darn it! Washed "Froggy" last night, even the POWERPLANT - but had to get to the lake and see that HOLE!
I brought Maggie along so she could shed in the wind for a few hours (I love getting blown fur between my eyeballs and sunglasses while I'm hustling down winding country roads).
Yes a fair amount of pot holes but the newly resurfaced stretches along the lake and through the trees are epic. Guess I'll just have to wash ol Froggy
again
...
comanche those are great pictures. I'm in Woodland which is about 45 minutes of two lane road away from Berreyessa. Guess I need to get up there and see the beauty!
Thanks guys - Yes. if you're in Woodland, you gotta get out there and tear it up. Sure there's some road wreckage, but you've got a car that can handle!
RE the shot of the 996 - i really liked the larger crop with more room for the tail - but the other distractions give good reason to crop. I did a 2 minute PS hack job using the lo-res jpeg, but I'd do it something like this:
I realize it's ghetto photoshop - but I'll bet you could stage it again and make it awesome!
Once I finish cosmetic refresh work the plan is to put some polished lip over pewter CH-Rs on my C2. With a subtle drop & spacers it's a deadly combo. Style for days without being over the top.
Carrera IIs & turbo look IIs are my favorite OEM wheels on the 996. Except of course refinished GT3s. Decisions, decisions
