fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Club GB

996 c4s side skirt

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 c4s side skirt

Leading reported evidence

Check numbers ash

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check the numbers Ash.

996 c4s side skirt
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check numbers ash' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check numbers ash' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check numbers ash

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check the numbers Ash.

996 c4s side skirt
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all, anyone know where the best place to buy the plastic dark grey side skirt for my 996? Was quoted 280 + vat from opc today. It's the long piece of plastic trim on the side/underside of the drivers side. Mine is cracked. Cheers Roy

POST 2Original post

Try phoning the parts department. I bought one for mine about 3 months ago, and it was £85+vat. It took my friend Tony about 30 minutes to change. I do recall it needed a few plastic clips at about £1 (total). I'll post the current price and part number tomorrow, when I get to my PC.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks Richard. That was the price quoted to me by parts dept west London opc. Rgds

POST 4Original post

That sounds like the price of a painted one. The black plastic one is much cheaper. I'll confirm tomorrow.

POST 5Original post

Sill Cover RHS in Satin Black - 996.504.364.00.01C - £101.45 +vat The painted one is for the Aerokit, and is about £400 in primer. Maybe they quoted you a fitted price......?

POST 6Original post

I replaced both of mine earlier this year as they had a little gravel rash. Part numbers as per Richards post (363 for the right side 364 for the left) unit price on my invoice was 97.54 each plus vat. Managed a significant discount from OPC though[ ] A fairly easy job to change but be aware the little rubber grommets in the cill have a habit of disappearing into the cavity when you're refitting I spent ages fishing a couple out with a fairly sturdy cable tie. the grommets are part no 996.504.715.00 and are 98p each

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks guys!! Very helpful, I phoned west London opc and he was still convinced that the painted one was the right one for me and said he'd never seen a black satin plastic along the bottom. I spent 15 mins talking a very irrate parts advisor through what it looked like. I gave up in the end. After Richard gave me the part number I called him and he said it wouldnt fit on my 996 C4S. I know it will and trust Richard implicitly. I was quoted 105 + vat. Can I ask what you managed to negotiate ? Thx once again. Roy

POST 8Original post

25%, worth getting some grommets too, from memory there are about 10 each side so 6 would do as spares

POST 9Original post

Check the numbers Ash. According to the PET 363 is left, and 364 is right. 9 times out of 10 RH numbers are even, and LH numbers are odd (in the third group).

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Wow! That is good. Opc westlondon have said no more than 10% and only on certain things.

POST 11Original post

you are correct Richard I had them the wrong way round[ ]

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.