fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Bruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Run off

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Only other benefit is tons of run off.

Original post Read captured discussion
Bruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Apparently that's left not a lot of run-off.

Original post Read captured discussion
Bruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run off' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run off' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run off

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Only other benefit is tons of run off.

Original post Read captured discussion
Bruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Apparently that's left not a lot of run-off.

Original post Read captured discussion
Bruntingthorpe any good? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Personally, I think it's pretty crap. The road surface is crap, bits of weeds, loose stones, all sorts. Also, the circuit is 'ill-defined' so there aren't clear apexes to clip etc. Not that exciting a circuit anyway. Only good thing is maxing it on the straight. I managed 140 in the rain in a BMW M3. Could do better, but the road surface was putting me off. Only other benefit is tons of run off. Quite safe from that point of view.

POST 2Original post

Was speaking to someone this morning who reckons they've now got thousands of lorries parked around the edge of the track. They used to store cars there and it would seem that lorries provide even more income. Apparently that's left not a lot of run-off. As Dom said, it's also a crap surface and not much of a circuit. Get to Donington or somewhere instead.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Oh well, donny's no further up the road, i'll give that the once over, cheers guys.

POST 4Original post

Hi Rich, I agree with the others it is also bloody expensive! The airfield that we have got is very easy to get to from the motorway and appears to be well suited to our purpose. Will let you know more after tomorrows run. Cheers SPS

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

This appears to be one of the nearest track days to me, is it any good, and who do I contact for details? Cheers all

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.