fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

"certified" issues

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH"certified" issues

Leading reported evidence

Replace during the certification process

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I can't seem to find an actual list of the "100+" point inspection, but I just feel that these things should have been noticed and replaced during the certification process and that dealer skimped on them.

"certified" issues
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace during the certification process' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace during the certification process' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace during the certification process

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I can't seem to find an actual list of the "100+" point inspection, but I just feel that these things should have been noticed and replaced during the certification process and that dealer skimped on them.

"certified" issues
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Hi All, We recently purchased a certified 05 Boxster for my wife, and I'm a bit dismayed by a couple things that have come up. We've only had the car for about 2k miles and 3 months (2-3 weeks of which is was in the shop after being rear ended), and already we need new tires and brakes. We're only at 30K miles, and the 20k service was performed (late?) before we bought the car with 28k miles. Don't get me wrong, I understand that these are wear items and aren't covered by any warranty or the like. In addition, the cupholder trim was loose and needs to be replaced (which we pointed out at purchase), and one of the seatback release levers (on the armrest side of the seat) was missing. I can't seem to find an actual list of the "100+" point inspection, but I just feel that these things should have been noticed and replaced during the certification process and that dealer skimped on them. We've called the dealer and the Service Manager was a bit shocked that we're getting a brake pad wear message at only 30k and won't comment further until we bring it in Thurs. We have a call in to the GM as well with our concern about these issues. Is there anything else we should do? Should we get PCNA involved? Thanks, Corey (The only bright point in this ordeal is I'm hopefully getting a croc for a loaner )

POST 2Original post

Needing tires and brakes at 30K is really no surprise at all. In fact, that's incredibly good service life for performance tires, which brings me to my next point. What gives with the 'Pre-Certified' status? I am no expert on pre-certified, but if there is a 100 point inspection on a used car I would expect tires and brakes to be in the top 10 of those 100 inspections. And I can't imagine that these items were worn from acceptable to unacceptable in the 1 week you drove the car. I would raise some very stern but polite questions to your dealership about this. Make it clear that you are very disappointed with the 'pre-certified' inspection. Tell them that you expected the pre-certified status to protect you from buying a car that needed immediate service and that would like to know why they would mislead you by selling you the car and not disclosing that the tires and brakes were beyond their usefull life at delivery. Ask them for the phone number to Porsche so you can call them to share your complaint. Once you ask for the phone number, I suspect that their whole attitude will change. PCNA is brutally hard on their dealerships. They don't want this kind of stuff to happen and they expect the dealers to be responsible for preventing it. I suspect that they will not want you to call Porsche and that they are very likely to work out a resolution with you.

POST 3Original post

I think we're pretty much in agreement. I'm not suggesting that wear items shouldn't need to be replaced at 30k miles but that these things certainly should have been caught during the certification process, and like you said, shouldn't have gone from acceptable by PCNA's standards to needing replacement in such a short period of time. We're taking an approach much like you've listed, so I'll see what they have to say tomorrow.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.