18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDrool or Fool ?
Leading reported evidence
Run several track days
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run several track days' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace coolant tank' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also, even though this is MK1, imaging the procedure to replace the coolant tank.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This. the last guy i know who added 100+ hp to a stock block ended up with a very nice sized hole in the side of it. Granted, it was a Honda and I told him to sleeve the damn thing, but not alot of factory NA engines can take an additional 120hp of forced induction.
No.
I am curious though, where is the alternator there? Charger sits where alternator is supposed to be.
Also, even though this is MK1, imaging the procedure to replace the coolant tank. It seems like you would need to remove the SC completely.
I turbo charged a ford focus at 9psi for quite long time. ran several track days with some success.
I didnt start blowing rods/pistons until i upped the boost to 15psi.
Motors were $350 with 1 year warranty and I could swap em out in a weekend.
I still wouldn't boost a NA porsche though.
Slapped a SC on my stock 95 mustang about 15 years ago. Took that stock motor from 225 to 385 hp. Beat the everloving **** out of that car. Held up fine.
Nissan's VQ35HR is a fun one. IIRC forged connecting rods from the factory & can handle a s/c that brings power on the 3.5L unit from 306 to ~400+. The serious problems start when you push it past 500 with a TT setup, from what I've read on the never-wrong internet.
Exceptions to the rule.
He is an SC 996 MK1 for sale in Dallas if anyone is local and drives it. I'd be curious on the feedback.
https://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/5992418550.html
That is actually a very nice looking car.... regardless of the somewhat shady supercharger. I say shady because i don't believe our engines were meant to have forced induction. Way different than throwing a blower on a mustang
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
