12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMY C4S
Leading reported evidence
Clean [
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Clean [' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean [' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It's a nice package (turbo running gear/4-wheel drive/wide body etc).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'm new to PCGB & am just trying out how to use the forum etc,.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi,
I'm new to PCGB & am just trying out how to use the forum etc,.
Thought a few pics of my car would be a start now I've finally worked out how to do it!!
Paul
Edit:
Paul
Hope you don't mind me helping out with the images here - Richard.
Welcome Paul The PCGB Form is a great way to get advise and learn a lot about these cars, i have been a member since 2004 now and worth ever penny. Nice to also chat to like minded people Also nice to see a C4S that isnt in silver. Cheers Phil
Hi Gary, Hope to see you next sunday but have a coolant leak to which I will be dealing with tomorrow!! Will update Paul Seagrave if I wont make it. Paul
I've just joined pre-purchasing a C4S at Christmas. The forum's advice and general information and chat was fantastic. Well worth the money. I bumped into a few like minded people at the PCGB stand at the NEc the other week, and was made very welcome and even given a coffee and packet of crisps.... Cant wait for the Silverstone Modern event and Le Mans for a real run in the car. I must say Richard is a goldmine of information.[
] Cheers Sean
Hi Kasspa, Welcome and excellent choice of 911. You will not stop smiling and may get into the upgrade addiction as there is plenty of interior, exterior modifications that can subtly enhance the best looking of the 996 range[
][
] Now Philippe we who drive a gorgeous looking silver C4S fully appreciate that the unique molecular structure of this coloured paint creates less drag than every other colour, thus a faster car!!!! Cheers Alan.
Hi Paul, congrats- I always liked the look of the 996 C4S with its 'wrap-around' rear reflector rear end. It's a nice package (turbo running gear/4-wheel drive/wide body etc). Hope you get as much enjoyment driving it as I had with mine. Regards, Andy L-T
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
