21 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH13 yr old Clear bra question
Leading reported evidence
Run into a dilemma
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Today I finally took one for a test drive that I have been researching, and ran into a dilemma that I have no experience with.
Leading evidence: 'Run into a dilemma' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend putting it back' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The pros use industrial clothing steamers because its much safer than using a heat gun.
I have personally used a heat gun on low settings ro remove mine before but I trust my own skills and wouldn't suggest it as the best way for anyone else
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But in any case I fully recommend putting it back on unless your area is pretty rock free...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Today I finally took one for a test drive that I have been researching, and ran into a dilemma that I have no experience with.
I have personally used a heat gun on low settings ro remove mine before but I trust my own skills and wouldn't suggest it as the best way for anyone else
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm looking to add a
2007 Cayman
to my stable. I'm veering away from muscle cars, for now and want something for my wife and I to drive and enjoy so looking this, as I have never been exposed to a
Porsche
and it fits the bill. I'm looking forward to the new experience.
I have been researching what to look for and what to avoid. Today I finally took one for a test drive that I have been researching, and ran into a dilemma that I have no experience with. The car had a full clear bra/ wrap on it. Every panel was covered to the edges not wrapped around them and it was starting to show its age. It was just starting to bubble and in some areas it was flaking off. To sum it up not a fan of the wrap, test drive went good. Loved the handling, the engine noise in the cockpit was fun to listen to, it had a little more road noise than I expected, but overall good.
I do all of my own work. This will not be hired out, I enjoy this aspect of toy ownership
So now the questions:
Hard hard would it be to remove 13 yr old clear wrap?
What can I expect the paint to be like when it's removed?
What should I be looking for with it on there/ what's it hiding for paint damage and such?
To remove the film with the lowest chance of damage you need steam.
Steam will loosen the adhesive in the film and allow you to very slowly remove it.
13yrs..... I expect the paint will be in pretty good shape if you go slow enough.
A large steamer will be needed. The tiny ones from
Amazon
won't cut a big job like that. Rent one.
You could also call your local
PPF
install place and ask them removal charge quote... but it will be spendy.
Remember, sloooooooow.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
If it looks pristine would you lift it anyway? Mine is at the ten year mark
next
year, the application looks brand new and I appreciate the spirit behind the effort but I can't say I would have had it applied.
As stated, you dont just peel off protective film. You need heat to do so from either steam or some other source to release the adhesive and then it will come right off. The pros use industrial clothing steamers because its much safer than using a heat gun. I have personally used a heat gun on low settings ro remove mine before but I trust my own skills and wouldn't suggest it as the best way for anyone else
Best to let the pros remove it if its in bad shape and you dont feel comfortable tackling the project yourself. The good news is the paint underneath should look great! My current
981
was wrapped on dealer floor before I drove away with it 7.5 years ago and the film still looks fantastic. Most have no idea its even there unless I tell them or show them
It's bubbling and looks dull and worn but still clear. I think it was mainly stored inside, so I've got that going for me. If the car didn't look odd close up, I'd leave it as you suggest but it looks odd.
Here is a pic of the car. Inside lighting misleads actual appearance. There is a couple of deep dings on the front end and on the passenger rear something has broken through and the clear bra is brittle. 41100 miles on her, that is why I'm really considering taking the risk on this car but want to be very sure of what I'm getting myself into with the removal of the bra and what's underneath.
I guess you missed it, but I’ll say it again
Do NOT use a HEAT gun.
Steam is what we use to remove
xPel
PPF
here. I don’t use it in an automotive capacity, but that’s neither here nor there. Paint is Paint.
Steam is slower and won’t allow hot spots, which minimizes the chance of cooking your paint.
Do what you like.
It took me about 2 hours to remove the original clear rock guards that were 14 years old. Used a handheld steamer,
Wd-40
and a plastic credit card to get the sticky goo left behind. Paint looked great. I don’t know if those are the same kind of material as
PPF
film though.
Sorry I did not miss it, I just forgot to ask on the reasoning. I'm not worried too much on speed, and the hot spots makes sense. Thank you for the clarification, I do sincerely appreciate your feedback. As it goes into the total equation.
Yikes, that stuff must be so brittle to crack off in little pieces like that! And it looks like the glue residue is also staying behind. It might be easier and better for your sanity to take a belt sander to it at this point and just repaint!😆
My mileage was better than some others above. 2006 car, removed clear bra in 2018. I don't know if it was applied in 06 or at a later date. Best tool for me was a plastic razor blade from a chain auto parts store. Surface warmed by sun. It was a Saturday project, paint shined up well.
My understanding is that 10 years is about the limit if cared for. But in any case I fully recommend putting it back on unless your area is pretty rock free...
. Mine was on the car when I got it, put on by pros and has saved me from a lot of chips. I even clipped a deer and it only caused a star crack in the bumper paint underneath the
PPF
. (yes I am VERY lucky). So they pulled off the
PPF
, repainted and sent it out to have new
PPF
back on the bumper. Looks like new now! And the
PPF
had a few abrasions and chips in it before, so those just went away. I might say one more thing -
PPF
that is 10-13 years old, is quite likely not as good as any new stuff you get today. Mine is definitely thicker than the pics but really optically clear. You have to tell people and show the edges or they can't tell. You probably can, but the protection is worth it. I have the full front and the kick panels on the side and rear qtr panel. Even with that I got to stones where the
PPF
is not....so I am glad I have it. Different colors may show it differently. Silver is pretty much no problem in my estimation. Good luck! and congrats on your new toy