fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Service history - how important?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHService history - how important?

Leading reported evidence

Inspect first

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Whatever you do get it inspected first

Service history - how important?
Frequently discussed work

Check invoices

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check invoices to see what work has been carried out...

Service history - how important?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Inspect first' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check invoices' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Check invoices

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check invoices to see what work has been carried out...

Service history - how important?

Check thing is a non-issue in my opinion fwiw

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If that doesn't show anything up then the annual check thing is a non-issue in my opinion FWIW.

Service history - how important?

Check which should be done

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There are a few other things to check which should be done on a time basis rather than mileage.

Service history - how important?

Inspect independently

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If in doubt, and as most do, get it inspected independently for pay OPC for the priveldge for your peace of mind.

Service history - how important?
Frequently discussed actions (6)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check invoices

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check invoices to see what work has been carried out...

Service history - how important?

Check thing is a non-issue in my opinion fwiw

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If that doesn't show anything up then the annual check thing is a non-issue in my opinion FWIW.

Service history - how important?

Check which should be done

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There are a few other things to check which should be done on a time basis rather than mileage.

Service history - how important?

Inspect first

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Whatever you do get it inspected first

Service history - how important?

Inspect independently

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If in doubt, and as most do, get it inspected independently for pay OPC for the priveldge for your peace of mind.

Service history - how important?

Use missing stamp as a lever of course)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Haggle for it(use the missing stamp as a lever of course)

Service history - how important?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi guys, I have a simple philosophy, when you don't know the answer, but know people that do, ask them! I have found a 2002 tiptronic 996tt, that's done 51000 mile and has many extras, however, the service history isn't perfect. It has had every service, on time or early, at a Porsche main dealer, however, has missed a couple of 'annual maintenance' checks. In the cars defence, between the services, it had done less than 4000 miles, but never the less, missed the checks. Is this really an issue and with everything else being right, is £30k a good deal. It's silver with black leather. :dont know: To be honest, I like it, but can't see me keeping it more than a couple of years, but as this is a LOT of money for me, it's only right I know all the facts before parting with the cash. As always, I value your opinions and you won't offend me. If you ask me one on event horses, I might be able to repay the favour/information! :dont know: Mark

POST 2Original post

A big big big bone of contention this one!! Ok a car has a "PERFECT" service book from an OPC. Looks great, ticks all the right boxes and so on! Still doesn't tell you if the previous owner or one before that got in the car and hammered it from cold or not?! :sad: :sad: I am in a similar dilema in selling my car soon and then looking for a "great" replacement!! :dont know: :dont know: How do I find that illusive car that has been well cared for?? :roll: deep sigh

POST 3Original post

The Annual check doesn't really involve any work, mostly visual inspection - If thats all that missing, then I wouldn't let it bother you. Check invoices to see what work has been carried out... Im exactly not sure what would of been done on a tt but it should of had it major (incl sparks/polybelt) done at 48K If in doubt, and as most do, get it inspected independently for pay OPC for the priveldge for your peace of mind.

POST 4Original post

30k for an 02 Tip is reasonable, but not cheap Theyre certainly about for that money or less, mainly depending on spec As above, teh annual inspection wouldnt worry me too much as long as the servicing was carried out to schedule by miles or time Whatever you do get it inspected first

POST 5Original post

not exactly expensive either. Cheap, rhymes with heap, a 100k car needs money spent to keep it in good condition. Buy on condition and get an inspection.

POST 6Original post

Cafsar makes the points to check out if you really like the car. My 2003 996 Carrera 2 Manual with only 26000 miles on the clock and a complete service history with no gaps is cheaper however! Regards Big Bob

POST 7Original post

If you are going to buy one then get a professional pre-purchase inspection. If that doesn't show anything up then the annual check thing is a non-issue in my opinion FWIW.

POST 8Original post

There are a few other things to check which should be done on a time basis rather than mileage. The service book has pages to be signed to show things such as airbag services, brake fluid changes etc. If these were not carried out then it could be a sign that the car has not been well looked after.

POST 9Original post

50k ish miles Silver Black leather 02 facelift features 30k £ about the average price. All the desirables are contained for the populus of buyers. There are some cheaper on offer but not without all the desirable features this car has. Drive it like it P Inspect it Consider the findings Haggle for it(use the missing stamp as a lever of course) Buy it or walk away Some cars are use as orniments and miss services due to the perception that milage covered does not warrant one- Quite wrong imo. As a potential buyer of this car(if it was a manual) the missing stamp would not put me off. Nor will it when I finally push on and buy one. JFDI In my opinion the finest sports cat available for the money at the moment My spec (looking for) Manual 996 TT 01/02 and on, facelift pcm would be nice Black/grey leather sunroofHistory not fussed if its not OPC Proof of work completed is more important than stamps in a book up to 55k miles Won't stop there though! Mods No exhaust changes Std pork wheels No suspension changes Read the recent 996 buying advice thread 80+ relies Contains lots of opinions. All past and future buyers.

POST 10Original post

exactly :agree: So I wouldn't let it worry u too much if u think it's priced correctly

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.