15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCDR 22 versus CDR 32
Reported or suspected cause
way of telling
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
There's probably a way of telling from the chassis no, but not sure.
Leading evidence: 'way of telling' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'way of telling' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
CDR 23 has diversity tuner, i.e it can listen out for traffic news on lots of channels, and butt into the radio station you are listening to.
It has an optical connection for the newer Audiopilot version of the Bose and so the station etc appears on the rev counter display.
It looks neater.
A car which has CDR 23, i.e 2003 model year, will have optical connections (referred to as MOST bus), which makes it much harder to upgrade the stereo, where in a pre 2003 car its just a straight swap for whatever stereo you want.
Could well be. There's probably a way of telling from the chassis no, but not sure.
It's a good stereo though to be fair. Does the car you're looking at have sound pack or Bose?
I think it has the sound upgrade as there are speakers in the door (which i'm told a'int standard) - though I don't see an option code to indicate this.
You might be lucky and have a non-MOST car, my 4S was a 03 model having a build date of September 2002, delivered October 2002 and that was a MOST car.
MOST = pain in the ass to upgrade. Requires new headunit, amps etc.
I'm guessing upgrading to a Becker Grand Prix is a much more difficult job then ? Perhaps impossible .....
What are other options for getting an Ipod and Bluetooth ?
My 99 carrera has a cdr 22 fitted I want to upgrade it, are my options either a cdr23 or a more modern becker unit and if I go for a more modern unit which one is the best, I'd ideally like it to bluetooth with my ipod touch and nokia phone or failing that a wired ipod connection, where do you hide the ipod though?
any help/opinions would be great
ty
N
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
