15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFine looking 987 Cayman - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use different/improved components
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So when Porsche fixed the problem, did they use different/improved components to ensure it doesn't happen again?
Fine looking 987 Cayman - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use different/improved components' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use different/improved components' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Fine looking 987 Cayman - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The original Cobalt blue car had a remap, exhaust and LWFW, nothing more. It, along with the weight reduction definitely gave the car a harder, more urgent edge.
Are you taking the car away for a couple of days, or merely a few hours ? If you want some recommendations for suitable roads close to SVP, I can give you some pointers .......
gen 1 have a quite a dead spot imo, deleting the 2 rear cats helps but the mods I did to the gen 1 really do help on the engine.
It's not about peak BHp but the car is just way more drivable with the power more linear.
I drove a gen 1 with the added diff, thought it did not need it ,so did not add it to mine in the end.
Sold the 19" and put 18" back on also.
looks like the front track is a lot wider on that car, also some thing both mine are today.
not telling you, you might go looking for it, :-p ok 3650rpm ;-) torque drops off and BHP dips.
then a smaller dip at about 4300
but if you want free reving you need to delete some cats. the cars so held back getting more air in and back out just free's it all up.
I won't post my 2 dyno plots , people give me hate mail if I do lol
this is some ramdon cayman chart
o crap I cannot help myself lol much nicer smoother line on the modded run.
Edited by mrdemon on Wednesday 26th November 23:26
Imo you should sell it and buy a mk2 NA exige.
Light weight, mine was 840kg, high reving and great steering, mine did have 46mm 3 way Ohlins on it though.
But it was a great drive.
Here is a vid vs a Cayamn me driving
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH5OacjJT50
Cmoose, what model Cayman did you end up buying, a 2.7 or 3.4?? (I thought you still had the 2.5 Boxster).
Did you buy it then realise it needed a rebuild?
Apologies for going over old ground, just want to get up to speed with your situation.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I see. So when Porsche fixed the problem, did they use different/improved components to ensure it doesn't happen again?
So I assume your car is still under Porsche warranty, or is it soon to be too old to renew?
anonymous said:
[redacted]
thats car talk for "wide open throttle" :-)
but you stated
"Yes, still under warranty until May. I can renew for a year up until early Jan."
but you want to fit lightweight fly wheel etc and do mods.
mrdemon said:
not telling you, you might go looking for it, :-p ok 3650rpm ;-) torque drops off and BHP dips.
then a smaller dip at about 4300
but if you want free reving you need to delete some cats. the cars so held back getting more air in and back out just free's it all up.
I won't post my 2 dyno plots , people give me hate mail if I do lol
this is some ramdon cayman chart
o crap I cannot help myself lol much nicer smoother line on the modded run.
Edited by mrdemon on Wednesday 26th November 23:26
Some healthy looking improvements there mrdemon. Ball park figure wise how much are you looking at for that improvement and how much difference do you feel in the drive.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
What is it about the look of your Cayman you don't like? Is it the ride height, or something else?
I had a 987 gen 2 in Guards Red (2.9) and loved its look....though occasionally I would it approach it from some angles and it would look a bit 'odd'!!
Here it is...great car!
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes, I know what you mean. I think it was definately the fact that they grafted a coupe roof onto an existing design originally produced as a roadster only...
That is why they had the trouble with the 'buffeting' in the interior...they tried to solve it with a moving weight in the rear hatch with little success.
The 981 Cayman has clearly been designed at the same time as the Boxster and is a much more coherent design....just my opinion, though others will disagree.
If you don't like the overall look, there isn't really a lot you can do with it I guess?
Edited by FrankCayman on Thursday 27th November 14:59
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.