15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHReplacing battery; does it need to be re-coded?
Leading reported evidence
Install correctly - the vent tube wasn't connected
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
in this case hadn't been installed correctly - the vent tube wasn't connected.
Leading evidence: 'Install correctly - the vent tube wasn't connected' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I fitted an H8, which requires adding a nut under the
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
But I’ve also disconnected and reconnected with no issues so we’ll see.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
died 9 years ago at 26K miles, the dealer replaced the H6 (under warranty) with the OEM H8 used in the
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 2 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
and it worked fine up until I stopped driving the car and let it go dead.
So long story short, car wouldn't start today. Drove it 4 days ago with no issues. I haven't been driving it much this winter and I am pretty bad at keeping the
battery
maintained; I've had it for almost three years and every year I basically end up letting the
battery
drain too long, have to throw it on the charger and then it seems to work fine.
Anyways,
battery
is from 2014 so it's probably time to replace it. It is a standard lead-acid Interstate 94R/H7
battery
(CCA 790 and 80 AH). I am considering switching to an
AGM
but being significantly more expensive, are there any real benefits to it vs the lead-acid type? Or should I just stick with it?
If I type in my make, model and year into the various
battery
suppliers (batteriesplus, walmart, interstate, etc) they come up with other size options including H8 and H9 all having higher cold-cranking amps (850-975) and higher amp hour ratings (85-90+). I can find 94R/H7 (with similar specs to my current
battery
) at all of these places but is there any reason to stick with the H7 or should I upgrade? I did see somewhere on here that the H8 was a bit bigger and required a new nut or bolt to secure the bigger
battery
but that's it.
Will I need to have the car re-coded at all for the replacement
battery
(
AGM
, or even lead-acid H7, H8, H9)? I have an
iCarsoft POR 2.0
, not sure if that can take care of potential
battery
issues or not. I read on here that someone was able to switch the part number (via POR) from the stock 70 AH to the part number for the 80 AH sized
battery
. If that was necessary, does that mean switching to a
battery
with a higher AH rating (or even CCA) will require extra coding/calibration? Or is it more or less just a straight
plug
and play? Thanks.
The
battery
tray should have 3x threaded holes for DIN H5 through H7 sized batteries, and I believe there is a hole for H8 sized batteries, but you'd need mounting hardware (read: a nut) in order to secure it.
My car came with an H8
AGM
and it worked fine up until I stopped driving the car and let it go dead. I replaced it with an H5 to save weight.
I don't think
Porsche
did
battery
registration until the start-stop system on
981s
but I could be mistaken. If the POR scan tool can do it, great, otherwise it is probably not needed.
When I changed mine, Interstate used a device to keep 12 volts flowing to the car during the swap, no issues, car is a 2011. I am going to get another new one, Costco has Interstate (now unfortunately Exide) anyhow their price is excellent so I'm going to see if they use that same device. As for
AGM
, no venting needed should eliminate any possibility for corrosion related to lead acid venting.
I had to change the
AGM
type Banner brand
battery
in my old
981 Cayman
S and was told the world would end if I did not fit a
Porsche
OEM version which carries a serial number. This is scanned during the
Porsche
replacement procedure and is used via
PIWIS
to register the
battery
with the car's power management systems.
Anyway I just installed an exact same Banner
battery
(capacity and cold cranking amp rating) and off I went. No flashing lights, no failures; the
battery
was still going strong after 3 years
If it's a 987 it doesn't need
battery
coding.
I don't think an H9 will fit. I fitted an H8, which requires adding a nut under the
battery
tray (there's a hole in the tray for H8 but it's not threaded, so you need to secure the bolt with a nut underneath the tray).
Ok cool. I have a 2010 base
cayman
. I’ve heard of people leaving their
battery
tenders connected. But I’ve also disconnected and reconnected with no issues so we’ll see.
deI have a
987.2
Just replaced
battery
and went with an H8 per
battery
company cross check with
Porsche
VIN. Not what I had but this fits and I feel it is the correct one. You will need to add bolt as mentioned. All I had to do was drive a bit to get rid of the PSM code. Head Nav stock unit (
bose
) kept all the info -stations ect..
ABSOLUTELY wrong on no-venting. There is a vent hole at each end of the
battery
, one will have a plastic
plug
in it.
Plug
the vent line into one of them. Put the
plug
into the other one. These are not "sealed" batteries - they are vented batteries where the electrolyte is in suspension in a glass-mat between the lead plates. It won't leak out (even if you drill a hole in the
battery
), but there is hydrogen produced on charging and a vent is an absolute necessity.
And
@gubi
is absolutely correct. Not only is no coding needed on a 987, it's not possible on a 987. Coding started with stop/start capabilities to optimize the battery state when used in stop/start. No stop/start = no coding needed or possible.
If it has a place for a hose I'd have hooked it up no matter what. The "no venting" was passed along to me by a C3 Corvette owner whose
battery
lives in the cabin so I'll pass that along, thanks.
Please DO pass it along to the Corvette owner. Someplace there is a newspaper article about a family that died (poisoned) in their
Cayenne
due to noxious gases from an
AGM battery
that was over-charging.
Cayenne
batteries sit right under the driver. The
battery
in this case hadn't been installed correctly - the vent tube wasn't connected.
Scary. Hook up the vent. Sometimes it takes a bit of looking to find the holes, especially if both have caps in them.
Found the story:
Florida officials say driver and daughter inhaled poison gas and died
and
Hydrogen sulfide inhalation killed mother, toddler found on Florida's Turnpike in June
I replaced my
987.2 battery
with this:
Duralast Gold Battery H6-DLG Group Size 48 730 CCA
I had AAA come out and their battery was too wide. It "could" fit with the bolt approach mentioned previously. Autozone's website, also, had the same battery as AAA. A gentleman at Autozone knew that the aforementioned battery was correct based on his experience with Mercedes. It fit exactly as the OEM with vent etc. I recommend this one.
When my original
battery
died 9 years ago at 26K miles, the dealer replaced the H6 (under warranty) with the OEM H8 used in the
911
. I watched the tech move the brace over to the
next
hole and bolt it in. The H8 fit like it was made for it (because it was). I've been using H8 ever since. l'm now using an H8
AGM
from Advanced Auto with 900 CCA.
I've read several threads on this topic and decided to not do it DIY. My
981
is a 14 and the
battery
has been going strong now for 10 years. On a C-tek tender if not being driven and I only replaced it due to the age. I did get an error on the
PCM
one day that said the unit was overheating and would not work till cooled. This was getting in the car in the garage, so not hot inside at all, and after the car had sat about a week. I decided it's possible due to low voltage maybe. My wife's
BMW
did weird weird stuff right before we were told by our Indi guy it needed replaced, and that
battery
is also 10 years old this year. So after reading about WHY it needs recoded to the car, I have surmised it's the stop/start tech system, because of how it monitors so much and has to meet certain criteria to function. OK..sure let's just bite the bullet and have the dealer do it. I always pay attention to gauge readings and recently the car has been charging at around 14.6-14.7v. After the new
battery
and coding, it has never left 13.2v. So I think there is definitely something to the theory that the car ramps up charging as the
battery
ages and requires it, to keep it in range for the stop/start tech. In my opinion, it was worth buying what they are selling as to the reason. It's not like it's a $15k Honda Accord. I decided it wasn't worth a few hundred bucks to risk issues down the road.
Dealer
battery
replacement was $746. But I knew going in to the brand 25 years ago, it wasn't ever gonna be cheap. And I'm ok with it.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.