9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGirodisc slotted rotors...
Leading reported evidence
Replace discs at somepoint and just doing some research
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Thinking about replacing discs at somepoint and just doing some research.
Leading evidence: 'Replace discs at somepoint and just doing some research' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace discs at somepoint and just doing some research' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you are trying to reduce brake fade change the pad material.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That what I'm trying to do by using PF pads / Disc's
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thinking about replacing discs at somepoint and just doing some research. I don't want to upgrade caliper size and go the whole Turbo/BigBrake Kit route so looking for a rotor that will work with current 4pots.
From what I'm gathering slotted rotors are a better performer than cross drilled. Increased braking due to greater disc/pad contact area together with longer life.
Found these...
http://www.girodisc.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=31_176_380&products_id=914
Comments or opinions?
Using slotted disc's instead of x drilled will get you away from the star cracking problem that you get on standard disc, and therefore should increase the life of the disc. That what I'm trying to do by using PF pads / Disc's
Whether a slotted disc has a greater contact surface area than a x drilled disc is questionable? And if it does I cant see it being noticable.
If you are looking to increase braking power, you need bigger disc's and 6 pot calipers
If you are looking to increase disc live I would suggest you get rid of the x drilled disc and go slotted
If you are trying to reduce brake fade change the pad material.
You mite want to look at
www.fvd.de
www.cargraphic.com
Both have a good selection of pads and disc's.
I was just looking at a straight alternative to OEM cross drilled but at $2200 I can't really see the value. I''m not going down the 6pot route as the car is not solely track focused and that's money better spent on a GT3...
Thanks though :thumb:
Stuart - instead of spending the pennies on upgrades as you have been doing, why not just save it for your forthcoming GT3....we can all see you getting one pretty soon anyway!
~ Maxie
Maxie I'm trying but I get an itchy shopping finger when it's quiet at work...
The internet is good for only 2 things, buying stuff and *****, and I can't surf ***** at work...
c:
Stu mate, put it down - your wallet that is
don't do it, you don't need any of it. Save save save as it will just be more money you can't get back on this car you could put towards the new one.
