911uk

saw these on ebay..

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHsaw these on ebay..

Leading reported evidence

Check with guys

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
i did send him a message but thought i'd check with guys on here as i'd go by their/your word over his...he might just say yes anyway to get rid of them.
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check with guys' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with guys' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Recommend against it

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
So unless you want the front of your car sitting 1-2 inches higher than the back, I'd recommend against it - after all, springs suspend the weight of the car so using springs from a model of car that is so differently weighted is just a mistake waiting to happen....
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Use springs

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
So unless you want the front of your car sitting 1-2 inches higher than the back, I'd recommend against it - after all, springs suspend the weight of the car so using springs from a model of car that is so differently weighted is just a mistake waiting to happen....
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check with guys

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
i did send him a message but thought i'd check with guys on here as i'd go by their/your word over his...he might just say yes anyway to get rid of them.
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Recommend against it

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
So unless you want the front of your car sitting 1-2 inches higher than the back, I'd recommend against it - after all, springs suspend the weight of the car so using springs from a model of car that is so differently weighted is just a mistake waiting to happen....
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Use springs

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
So unless you want the front of your car sitting 1-2 inches higher than the back, I'd recommend against it - after all, springs suspend the weight of the car so using springs from a model of car that is so differently weighted is just a mistake waiting to happen....
Original post Read captured discussion
saw these on ebay..

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

guys will these go on a 1998 996 c2 coupe even though it says c4 cabrio? i know i probably just answered my own question but you never know..lol peter http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI....ksid=p3907.m29&_trkparms=algo=LVI&its=I&otn=2

POST 2Original post

cough link cough

POST 3Original post

email the seller and ask them :?: :bandit:

POST 4Original post

They may fit but think about this. A c4 has a 4wd drive train over the front wheels. What doesn't a C2 have? Yep, you got it, 4wd. So unless you want the front of your car sitting 1-2 inches higher than the back, I'd recommend against it - after all, springs suspend the weight of the car so using springs from a model of car that is so differently weighted is just a mistake waiting to happen....

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

hi mate i did send him a message but thought i'd check with guys on here as i'd go by their/your word over his...he might just say yes anyway to get rid of them. peter

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.