10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnyone know anything on this GT4 ET22 JJV? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use warranty
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
They tell you the normal £10k spread is to cover the cost of prep and service and the 2yr used warranty.
Anyone know anything on this GT4 ET22 JJV? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use warranty' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace door trim' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Anyone know anything on this GT4 ET22 JJV? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Use porsche , whatever
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So was sent a video of the car in question today and as an approved used Porsche , whatever that’s supposed to mean!?
Anyone know anything on this GT4 ET22 JJV? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
No, nice car. I'd ask about the interior door casings. They don't seem to have the carbon trim finishers. Maybe it's a mis-build. Carbon trim is a cost option so I'd want that corrected, would look better if the doors matched the carbon trim in the IP/Console.
Interesting, I wasn’t a fan of loads of carbon so opted for the extended leather trim when I ordered. Wasn’t aware you could mix and match. This is what mine looked like:
DM101 said:
No, nice car. I'd ask about the interior door casings. They don't seem to have the carbon trim finishers. Maybe it's a mis-build. Carbon trim is a cost option so I'd want that corrected, would look better if the doors matched the carbon trim in the IP/Console.
It doesn’t have extended leather so the carbon won’t extend to doors . Nice spec other than the lack of leather / race tex .
GT3cs said:
It doesn’t have extended leather so the carbon won’t extend to doors . Nice spec other than the lack of leather / race tex .
You are right. I never knew that. I'd leave it. Shame they've speced in some really good stuff and then tried to save money which ends up in a mismatch. I'd have to change the door trim with my ocd.
DM101 said:
No, nice car. I'd ask about the interior door casings. They don't seem to have the carbon trim finishers. Maybe it's a mis-build. Carbon trim is a cost option so I'd want that corrected, would look better if the doors matched the carbon trim in the IP/Console.
Good spot, I hadn’t even noticed that!
So was sent a video of the car in question today and as an approved used Porsche , whatever that’s supposed to mean!? I am led to believe that gravel rash to most panels and the windscreen on a GT4 is acceptable. Correct me if I’m wrong but what used to happen in the old days was a dealer bought a car and then prepared it for retail, now it seems they just want to pay bottom dollar for the car , stick on a 15/20 k margin and send it….seems a bit wrong to me.
col68 said:
So was sent a video of the car in question today and as an approved used Porsche , whatever that’s supposed to mean!? I am led to believe that gravel rash to most panels and the windscreen on a GT4 is acceptable. Correct me if I’m wrong but what used to happen in the old days was a dealer bought a car and then prepared it for retail, now it seems they just want to pay bottom dollar for the car , stick on a 15/20 k margin and send it….seems a bit wrong to me.
They tell you the normal £10k spread is to cover the cost of prep and service and the 2yr used warranty. The prep to me includes sorting stone chips etc. but it would appear not especially the side sills that can get overlooked by a customer.
I’ve noticed now on the Boxster/Cayman that the plastic side panels get hammered with gravel rash especially under the air intakes.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
