3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAdvice please
Reported or suspected cause
owner won't let you take it there
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
Leading evidence: 'owner won't let you take it there' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'owner won't let you take it there' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check around 150.00 or a more thorough' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The Tip/Manual debate will run forever, but you should at least test drive a Tip, as it might surprise you.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check around 150.00 or a more thorough
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
owner won't let you take it there
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello Everyone.
As a long time Porsche owner (and Club member), mainly with air cooled 911's, plus a couple of 944's, I'm considering acquiring my first 996. The difference this time is that it will be my only car, rather than weekends only, and will cover around 15k pa. Having read up on various articles and performance statistics it looks as though the 'facelift' version is preferable to the 3.4 variant. The 4S model looks more desirable too, although I'm not sure my budget will stretch that far. What I would appreciate is some advice on things to look for (and look out for) when I start searching in earnest in a couple of months time. For instance, what are the pros and cons of 2WD vs 4WD; should I look only at Porsche specialist dealers, would I be wise to employ someone like Peter Morgan to check out any potential purchase; are there any particular options that are desirable; are there any specific reliability issues that I should watch out for; should I be looking for as low a mileage as possible, or is service history more important; and finally, my inclination is for a manual gearbox, but should I try a tiptronic version? I'm sure there are many other points to be aware of, so I would really appreciate any assistance from you experienced owners.
Thanks in anticipation,
Richard
Our buyer's checklist would be a useful starting point when viewing a car. You can get a copy via here: http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=269468# A lot depends on your budget, but I would say go for the newest car you can afford with reasonable mileage, that has a good service history. If you are going to keep the car for, say, 3 years, then you will be adding 45000 miles, so it is likely to end up being high mileage anyway. So you would have to buy one with extremely low mileage (and pay a premium) to end up with moderate mileage when you come to sell it. The Tip/Manual debate will run forever, but you should at least test drive a Tip, as it might surprise you. As for 2/4WD, they both have a different feel, so again, you need to try both. I've had both, and I have to say that I prefer the more pure Porsche feel of 2WD when I'm in the mood for a bit of spirited driving, but the 4WD is very reassuring in difficult conditions. Hope this highly non-commital reply helps, and enjoy your search.
The buyers guide Richard has linked is a great guide for buying. Make sure you look through the history and have a good read of it, as the OPC service paperwork will give engineers reports on any potential faults or issues at the service intervals, and you can see if authorisation was given to carry out the repairs and if they were then completed during that or later services. Don't be affraid to take time looking at the history when looking at the car, the owner should expect it. Make a note of where the services were carried out, if they were specialists and not OPC, then give them a call with the reg and ask them to validate the work carried out. If there was a recent service call the garage that serviced the car and try to speak to the tech that dealt with it to see if he can tell you anything else about the car (he may recall it if it was recent). If any history is missing, call any garages that are documented to have dealt with the car and ask them when, and at what mileages the car was seem, they will have a record. Always check the reg / vin against the history. You can get peter morgan to do a check, or an OPC to do a (200 point I think) check for around 150.00 or a more thorough check for around 200.00 (but you will need to get the car to the OPC, and likely the owner won't let you take it there, so you will need to be patient and arrange it around them). As Richard said, the mileage you are doing will mean you will want to ideally get a lower mileage model. I bought mine as what I thought was a bit of a bargain, it was high mileage, but it was mint, as an example I have only done 750 miles in the past 5 months, so I am in a different situation. You will likely pay a premium for a lower mileage model (although I recently spoke to someone who purchased a C4, same age as mine with half of the mileage for the same price, he happened to be in the right place at the right time!). Don't rush into buying one - I did (it's easy to when you see one in the flesh that looks, sounds and goes well), and in all honesty I love my 996 (I loved the colour, interior, sound and everything about the car when I first saw it), but my funds were limited, and I am starting to have to add things to mine to get it to where I want to be. Now I suppose this isn't a bad thing, as the I am renewing a lot of stuff vs it being old, however I probably would have rather waited a few months until now when I was in a better position and just put a extra few k in and got a model already with everything I wanted, or got a lower mileage model. Still, who knows what's around the corner (could have just as easily been in a worse position). I wouldn't say mileage is everything though, I would generally much rather have a car with comprehensive history that has wanted for nothing than have a lower mileage model with sketchy history. Take it for a good, long test as well - several times if you can. I took my car out three times over the course of a week before commiting (although my mind was pretty much made up after the first drive and as soon as I saw it! I just wanted to make sure it wasn't going to let me down when I handed the cash over). Good l uck.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.