fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Basic 997.2 3.6? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBasic 997.2 3.6? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Replace so this would be a factor

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I tend to go 6 months between changes so this would be a factor.

Basic 997.2 3.6? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace so this would be a factor' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace so this would be a factor' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace so this would be a factor

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I tend to go 6 months between changes so this would be a factor.

Basic 997.2 3.6? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hey guys, been out if Porsche for a while and one has popped up for sale on my doorstep.... It's a 2010 gen2 3.6, very basic, 18" wheels, pretty much nothing in the way of extras at all. It is however manual, black on black, beautiful condition, 17k miles, wearing matching pilot sports all round and the guy is looking less than £40k. The lack of spec doesn't bother me at all, it's the driving I love. But will it be a nightmare come resale time? I tend to go 6 months between changes so this would be a factor.

POST 2Original post

997 GT3's seem to be the "in thing" at the moment - there appear to be very few for sale and when they pop up the prices are far higher than you are quoting. If you look on the Porsche GB "used car locator" there is only one 997.2 GT3 and it is priced at about £90k. Even 997.1 GT3's seem to be in the £60k range. I would bite his hand off!

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Sorry didn't make it clear….it's a bog standard 997.2 carrera 3.6. Not a gt3. Is there a market for a back to basics 911 with a manual box? or is everyone after electric everything and pdk?

POST 4Original post

irish boy said: Is there a market for a back to basics 911 with a manual box? Absolutly. Just look at the classifieds of the Gen1. An S really is worth little extra money over a standard Carrera. Back in the day I well remember testers stating that the standard car was the better real world drive. It's the one I would have.

POST 5Original post

It's amazing the number of people who seem to be obsessed with maximum power, enormous wheels and an endless list of 'must have' options. The standard models drive just as well, if not better, than the fully loaded versions. Cover off the resale issue with the purchase price.

POST 6Original post

Wozy68 said: irish boy said: Is there a market for a back to basics 911 with a manual box? Absolutly. Just look at the classifieds of the Gen1. An S really is worth little extra money over a standard Carrera. Back in the day I well remember testers stating that the standard car was the better real world drive. It's the one I would have.

POST 7Original post

Carnt speak for 997.2 but have spent lots of time in both variants of the 997.1 and would say overall that the C2 is the sweeter drive. 19"s on non PASM can be harsh esp at low speed but I'd imagine fine on 18s. If I was going back into a carrera would edge towards the non S.

POST 8Original post

i am a bit of a fan of the basic 911 and imho a non pasm gen2 would be a great daily or a weekend toy and a car i would purchase if i did not have the spyder not a fan of pasm on a porsche.i would not worry about wheel size as i am sure it rides fine on 19s and wont be to harsh,my spyder has 19s and sports suspension and it feels like a sports car should feel like but on 18s will feel sublime!extras what extras most you wont miss aslong as it has xenons,phone module and sound pack(which i think are all standard) it will be fine anything else is a bonus you can always add pse,chrono and short shift at a later date if so desired. the gen2 997(345hp) is not that far off the power of a gen1 3.8s(355hp)and has the more robust engine which just loves to rev. i think you could haggle the price to mid/upper £30s though go for it! prices of gen2 cars seem pretty robust and being 4 years old most of the depreciation is gone Edited by itsybitsy on Wednesday 25th June 21:02

POST 9Original post

Got the same car ( but 59 plate) as you are considering ..very similar spec but mine has lowered chassis . Had it over a year & 10k miles and Opc still selling at just £2k under my buying price . Take off £5k for their profit and don't consider the depreciation drastic. Great drivers car .had a recent hooning with mates ( gen 2 gt3 RS & 430 scud) and only left trailing on decent straights, braking and handling exceptional .The car does NOT lack B road performance in any way and is a sharp driver. I'm not selling but wouldn't anticipate huge depreciation ( ie over £7kp.a.) as gen 2's so much better than original 997's in every way. Go try the car ,and as a driver , you won't be disappointed .......depreciation costs..... it's your choice....

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.