fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

996 C4s - major oil loss

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 C4s - major oil loss

Leading reported evidence

Check i thought a warranty might be a good way

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

While the car was in the OPC did a free 111-point check, I thought a warranty might be a good way to go.

996 C4s - major oil loss
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check i thought a warranty might be a good way' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check i thought a warranty might be a good way' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Replace problematic dual-row ims bearing

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I see that Jake Raby and LN Engineering are working on a retrofit kit for replacing the problematic dual-row IMS bearing for an improved version - with the engine in place.

996 C4s - major oil loss

Use car too little, could it be better

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Thanks for that Grant - it seems to me that low mileage cars are most susceptible to IMS failures - is that accurate, and could it be as a result of using the car too little, could it be better to buy one with a higher mileage?

996 C4s - major oil loss
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check i thought a warranty might be a good way

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

While the car was in the OPC did a free 111-point check, I thought a warranty might be a good way to go.

996 C4s - major oil loss

Replace problematic dual-row ims bearing

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I see that Jake Raby and LN Engineering are working on a retrofit kit for replacing the problematic dual-row IMS bearing for an improved version - with the engine in place.

996 C4s - major oil loss

Use car too little, could it be better

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Thanks for that Grant - it seems to me that low mileage cars are most susceptible to IMS failures - is that accurate, and could it be as a result of using the car too little, could it be better to buy one with a higher mileage?

996 C4s - major oil loss
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

Had a rattling noise from the rear which I initially thought was something that had worked loose in the engine bay.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My wife used the 996 C4S today, said she heard a funny rattling noise like an exhaust falling off - Stopped fairly quickly and looked underneath to notice massive oil leak & big puddle. I got there and no oil along road, only under car where she stopped. AA came out & said oil seemed to be coming from main oil seal area... car being towed home tomorrow so looks like RMS & major expense! However, there has not been any previous signs of a leak and would the seal suddenly burst?. Also, any ideas what the noise may have been? Car has only done 30kjavascript:emoticon(':sad:')

POST 2Original post

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but that's engine failure! What has happened is the failure of your intermediate shaft.

POST 3Original post

Sounds very similar to my intermediate shaft failure. Had a rattling noise from the rear which I initially thought was something that had worked loose in the engine bay. Next thing was a significant loss in power and when I pulled up the a massive puddle of oil appeared, similarly no trail, it just seemed to let go when I pulled up. Is the car under warranty? If not I wouldn't panic, mine wasn't but was resolved without any expense on my behalf.

POST 4Original post

Tell us Chipfork, how did you proceed to get resolution without cost :dont know: Ray

POST 5Original post

A friendly expert confirmed the actual problem. I also talked to someone in the know who explained that Porsche have a goodwill system in place and that my low mileage example (19k miles) should be looked upon favourably. In many cases Porsche had contributed significantly to the costs. He suggested that I shouldn't claim any knowledge of this and simply get it to an OPC for diagnosis. The OPC rang back, explained it would need a new engine whereupon I was bracing myself for a discussion about the cost. To my surprise they said an engine had been ordered and that it should be delivered the following day. When I asked about cost they said it would be covered by Porsche. Diagnosed on a Weds afternoon and collected on the Friday afternoon, amazing! When I went to collect there was a form I had to sign and attached were photographs of the engine and all the bits they'd recovered from the sump, not pretty. Not sure if there's any basis in this, but I was told it was likely Porsche picked up the entire bill in order that I would have no implied warranty or comeback if the new engine had a problem. If I'd had to contribute then this would provide some comback. While the car was in the OPC did a free 111-point check, I thought a warranty might be a good way to go. They also carried out some minor work for next to nothing and fitted two new front tyres for the same price as the best I could find on the internet. I went from severely stressed to extremely impressed, excellent service from the OPC and relief that Porsche had immediately authorised a new engine. I hope ktmkev has a similarly troubleless experience getting his car sorted out!

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Bad News Exactly as you diagnosed. I got the car back to the Indy that I bought it from 15 months ago (very reputable company) and they took sump off to confirm fault. Cost estimated at £3,500 + vat ! I asked about assistamce from Porsche but was told that Porsche only help if car bought from OPC and serviced by them. Surely a 4/5 year old Porsche with only 30k miles should not fail. It has been serviced regularly as per the schedule.. but by the Indy not an OPC. I asked what the chances are of the same fault occurring again and have been told that the replacement bearing is different. Does anybody know how the sale of goods act may help in this case?. I seem to remember that there is something in law that states a consumer is protected beyond any standard warranty period and up to 5 or 6 years if goods prove to be of insufficent quality during the period that they could have reasonably expected to have lasted. I would have expect a Porsche engine to last longer than 30k miles.

POST 7Original post

Sorry to hear it's as people suspected. As for assistance from Porsche, my car was bought from an independent but did have a full OPC service history so that may have been the difference. I was told by an ex OPC Service Manager to get it to an OPC and to not mention that someone else had looked at it as this may have prejudiced my case even though it was purely diagnosis. As for the replacement bearing, I was told that 2004 year models had an uprated part already so this may well be a third party improvement. I'm hoping that my replacement engine has such an improvement. I don't know if the sale of goods act can help your case but I know the indy that diagnosed mine were assisting with claims for one or two of their customers for the same failure. The guy there is very knowledgeable and might be able to offer some advice, feel free to pm me for his contact details. Good luck and hope that Porsche resolve it to your satisfaction.

POST 8Original post

3.5k + vat for an ims failure! i thought you were talking a new engine plus fitting?? to be honest this is one of the reasons i sold my c4s (which was mint and in perfect working order with full opc history) but if was going to fork out 12k on a new engine and fitting etc id be happy to, if it was NEVER going to fail again, but from what ive heard and read, all id be getting is a new version of the engine that just failed, it just wasnt worth the worry for me anymore, loved the car, hated the stress.

POST 9Original post

IMS bearing failure is one of a few classic reasons we need to rebuild these engines. We have 3 cars in our workshop at the moment with this problem. In our experience they are always rebuildable but the debris which gets dragged round the engine can wreak other components such at the oil pump, scavenge pump, etc which adds to the cost. In most cases £3-4k + VAT (if not on our maintenance plan but considerably less if participating in the scheme) usually sorts it out but there can be the rare occassion when more damage has occured (possibly through driving it for too long once the problem has started). Whilst apart its a good time to address other "weakspots" such as new cranks shaft bearings, timing chains, fitting restraining rings to the top of the cylinder bores, fitting a better IMS bearing with modifications, a stronger IMS spindle, overhauling the cylinder heads, etc. On a more positive note the vast majority of 986's & 996's we look after don't suffer from engine problems and are very reliable. Grant

POST 10Original post

Thanks for that Grant - it seems to me that low mileage cars are most susceptible to IMS failures - is that accurate, and could it be as a result of using the car too little, could it be better to buy one with a higher mileage? Cheers, LOJO

POST 11Original post

I see that Jake Raby and LN Engineering are working on a retrofit kit for replacing the problematic dual-row IMS bearing for an improved version - with the engine in place. Not cheap, but could potentially save a packet. http://www.flat6innovations.com/saving-an-engine-ims-retrofit

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.