14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGeo Recommendations
Leading reported evidence
Set car up perfectly
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think there are indeed a lot of Geometry experts who can set the car up perfectly to the numbers...
Leading evidence: 'Set car up perfectly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set car up perfectly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I have uses Pro-Tyre in Enfield on the A10 in the past and always seemed which good and have all the right gear, and was going to try A&S Wheels & Tyres in South Woodford who have done tyres for me as well - nice chaps.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I have uses Pro-Tyre in Enfield on the A10 in the past and always seemed which good and have all the right gear, and was going to try A&S Wheels & Tyres in South Woodford who have done tyres for me as well - nice chaps.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have heard some good things about Center of Gravity but they are not too local to me in east London.
Is it really worth travelling 220 miles round trip or are there better / equivalent outfits in the London, East London, Herts, Essex area that are recommend?
Thanks,
Rob
Yes, it really is - I travel (a bit) further and it is always totally worth it. Try to spend the day with Chris while he's doing your car and you'll learn a lot about how the car responds to different setups so that as your driving requirements change, you will get to recognise where your current settings are holding you back and therefore what needs doing to the car the next time you go.
Rob,
Please dont laugh, this suggestion is a little unauthodox but you could try Derek Tansley at DT Trucks in Barking.
Derek set mine up for me a few months ago and transformed the car totally.
Whilst he isnt a Porche specialist - far from it, trucks are his main thing.
He does have all the equipment and knows ho to use it.
He does a lot with rally and motorsport teams.
Dave
His tel no is 020 8595 4400
Thanks for the heads up guys.
I have uses Pro-Tyre in Enfield on the A10 in the past and always seemed which good and have all the right gear, and was going to try A&S Wheels & Tyres in South Woodford who have done tyres for me as well - nice chaps.
I think I was looking for someone a bit more specialist on a 996 but might give Derek a call and see what he can do for me. Thanks for the recommendations so far!
Not a specialist but Tony at Wheels in Motion (based in Chesham) is a well known expert on geometry setup and may be able to to an excellent job on porsche. Search for his website.
I think there are indeed a lot of Geometry experts who can set the car up perfectly to the numbers... however I'd suggest that is not what Chris at CG is about..
He goes away from the numbers to settings that give you what you want from the car...
garyw
Hi David,
I am heading up there this Saturday as well, from South Woodford for a 10am appointment. Probably head up the M11 from Redbridge roundabout or maybe through Epping Forest [
] to the M25....
What time is yours / when are you leaving and from?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
