Planet-9

Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHUsed Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Leading reported evidence

Replace oil about a month ago, the filter was

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Frequently discussed work

Clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust"

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace oil about a month ago, the filter was' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust"

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Replace its formulation

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
"Higher" moly is probably due to LiquiMoly MoS2 I added previously and high Magnesium may be due to M1 changing its formulation for SP.
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust"

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Replace its formulation

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
"Higher" moly is probably due to LiquiMoly MoS2 I added previously and high Magnesium may be due to M1 changing its formulation for SP.
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Replace oil about a month ago, the filter was

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain
Original post Read captured discussion
Used Oil Analysis - 987.1 2.7 M1 0W-40, 5000 mi / 11 months

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Was curious about the metal wear - IMS / bore scoring. When I changed my oil about a month ago, the filter was clean with just a tiny bit of "metal dust" on the magnetic drain plug . Sent a sample to Blackstone and got this. I included the "old" (from 5+ years ago?) VOA for my reference / comparison for both SP and SN (I originally only listed SN hence the lower Magnesium number). "Higher" moly is probably due to LiquiMoly MoS2 I added previously and high Magnesium may be due to M1 changing its formulation for SP. Just FYI

POST 2Original post

That does look like the SP formula, rather than the old SN formula(VOA column). Much less detergents(Calcium+Magnesium) than the old formula, so hopefully better regarding bore scoring on the 3.4L+ engines.

POST 3Original post

Thanks and got the same reply on BITOG...are you the same guy??

POST 4Original post

FWIW, @Hoster987 - I like the Blackstone reports as that's just pure science (I used to do elemental analysis in a lab for a major Pharma company). If they said their analysis was good (I think your engine is the first five line items; the rest is from your oil), I think you're fine. FWIW - You can always email them and ask. They're great about such things per recommendations!

POST 5Original post

Thanks for the feedback and advice as usual!! And I was mostly curious about the metal wear which is "normal." Since I am rather new to the porsche scene I thought this analysis can put my mind at ease

POST 6Original post

I can’t make any guarantees , but it looks promising! I would email the guys at Blackstone and get their take on this, TBH.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.