fullymatted.
Back to search
Pelican Parts

Im back from the black hole

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHIm back from the black hole

Leading reported evidence

Replace items and they were in perfect condition

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Previous owner did the RMS and IMS, but I have the replaced items and they were in perfect condition.

Original post Read captured discussion
Im back from the black hole
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace items and they were in perfect condition' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace items and they were in perfect condition' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace items and they were in perfect condition

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Previous owner did the RMS and IMS, but I have the replaced items and they were in perfect condition.

Original post Read captured discussion
Im back from the black hole
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Pelican Parts: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hey guys...Last I was in Pelican "You last visited: 07-17-2007 at 06:35 AM" At the time I had an air cooled 80 SC Targa that was converted into a Cab. Got out of Porsche for a minute Now I am the owner of 04 Targa and now I find myself more on Rennlist than Pelican, but its good to know there's so much info being inputted out there as it was when I was here. I am just glad to be back into a Porsche and the 996.2, even with its infamous engine

POST 2Original post

I sold my backdated 1979SC in June 2022, and purchased a 2002 996.2 base with 6 speed. Previous owner did the RMS and IMS, but I have the replaced items and they were in perfect condition. I love my 996 and love autocrossing it since I got it.

POST 3Original post

Welcome back! We still have an absolutely terrific community here full of help and knowledge! Be sure to check out our useful 996 tech articles as well! https://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/996_tech.htm

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.