16 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOver Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use cars can be misrepresented
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Personally after hearing about, well, reading about, all the ways used cars can be misrepresented to a buyer I'd have to see enough of the over rev printout to assure myself it was from the car in question and taken very very recently.
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use cars can be misrepresented' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Run time, does this give a reasonable value
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Using the odometer divided by the engine run time, does this give a reasonable value for average miles per hour?
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use durametric
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use odometer divided by the engine
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Using the odometer divided by the engine run time, does this give a reasonable value for average miles per hour?
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use cars can be misrepresented
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Personally after hearing about, well, reading about, all the ways used cars can be misrepresented to a buyer I'd have to see enough of the over rev printout to assure myself it was from the car in question and taken very very recently.
Over Revs Test Results - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have an over revs test which shows no over revs in all 6 ranges however in the operating hours counter 1-6 the results are all 0.000h but the operating hours counter is 319.400h
There are 13 misfire detection range 1
range 0 misfire detection 7
Does this look right? I was at least expecting something in range 1-3 and why are there no operating hours in the over speed ranges?
Magic919 said:
The operating hours would correspond with any overrev events. If there are no events...
Thanks Magic919 I must admit I'm surprised how clear it is!
I received it as a PDF on an email, there is no reference to time, date or registration to the vehicle is that also correct?
LukeS said:
Thanks Magic919 I must admit I'm surprised how clear it is!
I received it as a PDF on an email, there is no reference to time, date or registration to the vehicle is that also correct?
I think the chassis number should be on the print out, can't remember if the date is shown.
There should be a time for the over revs in range 1.
Using the odometer divided by the engine run time, does this give a reasonable value for average miles per hour?
By "reasonable" something around 30mph? A higher number could be a mainly highway car. A lower number means the car spends less time on the open highway. A real low number could be legitimate -- garage queen…. -- or signs of odometer tampering.
Personally after hearing about, well, reading about, all the ways used cars can be misrepresented to a buyer I'd have to see enough of the over rev printout to assure myself it was from the car in question and taken very very recently.
The ave speed worked out at 40.40 mph which is sort of average from what I have been able to read.
The cars exterior and interior is spotless and the history checks out but I know what you mean regarding misrepresenting.
Do you really know how a cars been driven?
Personally I would feel better if there was proof the printout had the reg or something to link it to the car.
No!! 40mph is way to high!
Mr Demon only averaged 30mph when he spent all his time on the motorway.
Sounds fine Luke although as mentioned chassis number is stated on screen too, WPO.........
If in doubt get an expert involved.
FWIW my 997.1 GT3 had zero rev ranges recorded in all rev ranges when I had an OPC inspection before I bought it.
There is no guarantee with these things but a rev range check and confirmation from an OPC is probably as good as you will get (it also means that you are eligible for a warranty too)
marky911 said:
No!! 40mph is way to high!
Mr Demon only averaged 30mph when he spent all his time on the motorway.
Sounds fine Luke although as mentioned chassis number is stated on screen too, WPO.........
If in doubt get an expert involved.
I had a 997 with a lifetime average of 55mph, all documented and correct, although admittedly on the high side for a UK car. It was a great car of course, having done a lot less actual work than the number on the odometer would suggest to most buyers.
I agree with wanting a report showing the VIN and time/date though.
Yep that is quite high Marcus but as you say the car checked out in all other areas so all was well.
I was just jesting about 40 being high. My own car has averaged 38mph over its life. Mr D always pops onto these threads though and says his cars have averaged 28 or 33 mph or something. Any car with a higher average is automatically a thrashed dog and must have loads of rev range recordings.
I still don't get his link between mph and rev ranges though. I know of tracked cars with hardly any values recorded and road cars with loads. (And vice versa obviously).
I was given a rental Astra when my M3 spun a bearing - it showed an average speed of 83mph over a 1500mile euro trip (incl Sat/Sun tourist laps at Ring and full day at SPA on the Monday).
mikem7709 said:
I was given a rental Astra when my M3 spun a bearing - it showed an average speed of 83mph over a 1500mile euro trip (incl Sat/Sun tourist laps at Ring and full day at SPA on the Monday).