13 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnother test drive
Leading reported evidence
Test drive today and was v.impressed
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Test drive today and was v.impressed' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drive today and was v.impressed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Had a test drive today and was v.impressed. I was a devout air-cooled 911 fan having had 5 of various vintages up to 993 which I thought could not be surpassed. I couldn't forsee ever wanting a water-cooled Porsche and the fried-egg look of the 996 does nothing for me.... that was until I started to read and follow the
Cayman S
story. This is the first Porsche since the 993 I have lusted after and the drive today confirmed it is a 'proper' drivers car. The spec was coventional suspension, 18' wheels and nothing else that mattered to me. The car feels like it's hewn from granite and feels so planted and balanced it was a revelation. The ride (as I suspected it would be) was amazingly compliant and the test route covered mainly very broken tarmac surfaces in greasy wet English autumn conditions. The PSM in these conditions worked very well, not intrusive but if I was brutal on wet leaf covered back roads it would intervene to protecct me from my own stupidity.
The car is very accessible, I felt at home heeling and toeing within 5 minutes of driving and the sound experience is pure music to any flat 6 enthusiast. My dealer was very civil and has invited me for another drive next week (hopefully in drier conditions) but I am sold on the car. I never thought I'd say it but I think it is better than the 993 whilst definitely in the same 'drivers car' mould.
I am purely interested in this car as an enthusiastic road user and hence my spec is :-
Red, 19'
carrera
classic, sports seats, climate
my only gripe (which indicates how brilliant I think teh car is) is that the gear lever feels rather plasticky to the extent I looked on the web site at possibly selecting the ALU gear lever option.
Comments from enthusiasts such as yourself, who now have an opportunity to drive the Cayman, speak volumes more than the automotive press. It has been my opinion from the start that with the Cayman, Porsche is attempting to recapture some of the 'elemental' driving experience of a basic sports car. They have apparently achieved that goal.
Less of the 'old' K-Man S' .. and yes having had 5 old air cooled cars puts me in that category .... but let me tell you, driving the car today I felt 20 ... complete hooligan !! It was like the day I drove a 911 for the first time ... special, and if you get to my age and driving a car makes you feel like that you know it is a good thing.
I guess that's why all the discussions about sat-nav,
PASM
,
sport chrono
... leave me cold ... all a hooligan needs is a properly sorted regular chassis, a wicked engine and the open road .. gadgets I leave for the kids ;-) ... and I design silicon chips for a living .. how hypocritical is that !!
It's funny, because I am a designer (not silicone chips) also, and feel exactly the same way. I did have the
sport chrono
in my spec, but that was for 'extra' fun. But at the end of the day, I can honestly say that every car I have had has been basically standard spec, and from my first 'new' car, a Ford Puma, I have been a devote believer in taking a car as the designer meant it to be. I like a paper map. I can look out of the back window to see what I'm going to hit when I stick it in reverse. But ther is nothing I can (or want to) do about a chassis that feels lumpy or floaty, or an engine that lacks sparkle or go.
I have always strived for the best drivers car I could afford, and bar the MGF VVC, I think I have managed it. But I know the Cayman is going to move my perceptions to the next level. I just hope that if need must, I will be content making the step back!
Jack
By the way, nickh1961, why do you go for red? Do you like to be seen coming, or just like the color? It sounds like you've had a few fast cars to play with for color choice also.
Edited by - K-Man-sculpture.net on 12/01/2005 4:22:20 PM
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. With so many 996/997 owners being critical of the Cayman it is always nice to hear from another air-cooled Porschephile who likes it. I bought the car because I like new cars with warranties and wanted a comfortable but elemental sports car. While I have to wait for January in the States to drive one, your opinion confirmed I ordered the right car.[/quote]
I've had red cars in the past, but I've never been a great lover of Porsches in red. HOWEVER, I have to admit that the Cayman does look superb in red. Pictures of it with the Classics make it look like a cross between a Porsche and a Ferrari - not a bad gene pool !
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.