fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Chip mod

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHChip mod

Leading reported evidence

Run richer

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Also, they may be remapping A/F slightly to make it run richer, so that would have a deleterious impact on gas mileage.

Chip mod
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run richer' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run richer' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use powerchip

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

wanted to bump this old thread and find out if any members have used Powerchip?

Chip mod
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run richer

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Also, they may be remapping A/F slightly to make it run richer, so that would have a deleterious impact on gas mileage.

Chip mod

Use powerchip

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

wanted to bump this old thread and find out if any members have used Powerchip?

Chip mod
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Has anyone done a chip mod yet? Powerchip is claiming 306HP / 260 Lb-ft, or 312 HP / 265 Lb-ftbased on which flash they use. So, they are seeing 5.5 HP / 1 degree of advance in timing. https://www.powerchipgroup.com/interact/datasheets/datasheets_two.asp Paul

POST 2Original post

Paul You have probably read this topic: http://www.planet-9.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2312&FORUM_ID=9&CAT_ID=4&Topic_Title=more+power+anyone&Forum_Title=Cayman+UK I really feel strongly that the so called power chips are a waste of money. They all compromise an exisiting setting that usually have a negative impact somewhere else (more fuel used and so on). I'm also not yet personally convinced that my day to day driving requires a few more hp. Do you think the risks and expense are worth the extra power if where real?

POST 3Original post

I was more 'probing' to see if anyone has actually made a chip modification as opposed to advocating doing the mod. That said, yes advancing the timing will enhance HP. In fact, it is one of only two ways to enhance HP (the other being A/F ratio). So, it is definitely not 'snake oil'. It is the same way tuners have been squeezing out horsepower for over 70 years. Yes, there are draw-backs. Nothing in this world is free, otherwise Porsche would have simply made this very simple adjustment themselves. The drawback is octane - you must (absolutely no wiggle room) have very high octane in your car 93-94 or it will detonate. I already put in 93 octane, so that wouldn't necessarily be an issue for me. Also, they may be remapping A/F slightly to make it run richer, so that would have a deleterious impact on gas mileage. I'm not pushing the modas 'good' and should be done, but it is certainly legitimate (in theory) with few drawbacks if you don't mind paying for higher octane fuel and more of it than normal... Paul

POST 4Original post

wanted to bump this old thread and find out if any members have used Powerchip? they claim 17hp and 14lb torque increase with 93 gas without any other mods. real or marketing

POST 5Original post

In actuality, the A/F ratios are typically leaner in performance software upgrades. Particularly in N/A vehicles. The factory programming is rich as Porsche must account for different fuel qualities and varying degrees of owner care. By leaning out the A/F and modifying the timing, tuners are able to get the power they do. Even in a worst case scenario, someone using 87 Octane fuel, factory safeguards will still prohibit timing advance and richen the A/F to inhibit detonation. With that said, many cars with ECU upgrades will typically show an increase in mileage under normal driving conditions.

POST 6Original post

Not real sure about N/A engines but I can tell you in non N/A engines (Turbos) the gain from an ECU remap (GIAC, REVO, etc.) is significant. Some can give you as much as 100HP/90-100 ft lbs tq for a little over $2K...and it reduces spooling time. Whats not to like? Non N/A engines --- I'd do it all day long (and will if I could ever sell my CS and pick up the 996tt) N/A engines ---- I'd like to hear from someone that has done it.

POST 7Original post

George, any comments on this article? http://www.europeancarweb.com/tech/0507ec_chip_tuning/

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.