25 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHow is this a C4S with a scoop?
Leading reported evidence
Replace rear logo
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
either a hack....or someone dropped a non-turbo engine into the car (after a possible death) and changed the rear logo...
Leading evidence: 'Replace rear logo' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check under the lid' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyway nothing visible when checking under the lid.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
either a hack....or someone dropped a non-turbo engine into the car (after a possible death) and changed the rear logo...
Did you PM the guy and ask? I'd be curious to hear the answer...
Also $42K is a little high for that car
Trying to make an excuse, maybe it helps prevent sucking lots of water when speeding in rain. I think I just got a CEL light speed boating to work this weekend. Got back in the car last night to go for some team building beers then home and I notice the CEL. I start thinking the light must be wrong. Then I remember tons of water in the dark that morning while sensining out the handling. When I get off my butt the durametric better tell me whats up. I figure the MAF got a treatment. Coil packs weren't cracked 5k miles ago. Anyway nothing visible when checking under the lid.
why is that such a no-no if somebody put side scoops on nb 996, is that worst than puttin a vette motor in a porsche? i thought it was all about what the owner likes.
It's perhaps not as bad as that, but at the same time, trying to sell it might prove to be more difficult, especially to an enthusiast. On an off topic note, very clever user name.
At the risk of offending anyone who has done this ludarcis mod to their (otherwise perfect) car...
Why not just buy a mustang? I am fairly certain they come with a stock "faux-intake" on the rear quarterpanel without going through all the trouble of cutting holes in an (otherwise perfect) Porsche... If good old uncle Ferdinand wanted an intake on the NB he would have spoken from the grave to ensue it was placed there.
