fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Has anyone broken the code???

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHas anyone broken the code???

Leading reported evidence

Use boxster s stats

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S.

Has anyone broken the code???
Frequently discussed work

Test /certification

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S.

Has anyone broken the code???
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use boxster s stats' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test /certification' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Test /certification

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S.

Has anyone broken the code???

Test cars at the port

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My Audi S4 was held up since Audi was contesting the gas guzzler tax when the car was introduced and EPA was supposedly randomly testing cars at the port.

Has anyone broken the code???

Test has been done and approved by the government

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The Cayman's have EPA mileage stickers on the cars so I assume all testing has been done and approved by the government.

Has anyone broken the code???

Use time

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

On the positive side, I was at my dealer today to trade in my 911, and he told me that they can use the time before January 14th to install any options you may want.

Has anyone broken the code???
Frequently discussed actions (5)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test /certification

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S.

Has anyone broken the code???

Test cars at the port

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

My Audi S4 was held up since Audi was contesting the gas guzzler tax when the car was introduced and EPA was supposedly randomly testing cars at the port.

Has anyone broken the code???

Test has been done and approved by the government

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The Cayman's have EPA mileage stickers on the cars so I assume all testing has been done and approved by the government.

Has anyone broken the code???

Use boxster s stats

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S.

Has anyone broken the code???

Use time

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

On the positive side, I was at my dealer today to trade in my 911, and he told me that they can use the time before January 14th to install any options you may want.

Has anyone broken the code???
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Has anyone figured out how to get your Cayman early (before January 14th). Mine was built November 7th and I feel like it is just rusting away in a parking lot some where. I sent a nastygram to Porsche with no response and I just got a shrug from my salesman with a comment that there is nothing he can do.

POST 2Original post

Better give up this idea. See other posts that suggest Porsche is unable to releaseUS cars untilwe reach the emissions certification date. On the positive side, I was at my dealer today to trade in my 911, and he told me that they can use the time before January 14th to install any options you may want. Might be a good time to send the car out for a radar detector, etc.

POST 3Original post

The dealer will install the radar detector? Is so, how much will they charge?

POST 5Original post

What if this certification thing doesn't get completed by January 14th? Does anyone know when the certification is supposed be legal? This is a bummer for those that had early builds. I wonder if this also detains the shipping to the USA. I am going to try to get some answers from my dealer, but if anyone knows anything, please post it. Thanks Russ

POST 6Original post

My dealers have always installed them for free. Just ask. [/quote] I don't think the dealers will get the cars before the release date. Porsche will hold them at the portbecause once a dealer has to starting paying to floor plan his inventory he will want to deliver the car ASAP and won't wait for some artificial release date. [/quote] The Cayman's have EPA mileage stickers on the cars so I assume all testing has been done and approved by the government. My gut tells me that isn't the holdup anymore and this is just a marketing decision by Porsche. My Audi S4 was held up since Audi was contesting the gas guzzler tax when the car was introduced and EPA was supposedly randomly testing cars at the port. When I got my car, I didn’t get a sticker since they weren't printed at the time! [/quote]I could be wrong but am still anticipating delivery in late January or early February as promised by my dealer.[/quote]

POST 7Original post

If you look at the Cayman window stickers more closely you will see that they exactly match those of a Boxster S in terms of MPG, pollution rating, etc. I think Porsche used the Boxster S stats to just have something to print on while awaiting final word on the testing/certification for the Cayman S. I can't see how the Cayman S will get the exact same gas mileage as the Boxster S given it has a larger engine with more aggressive cams, also the pollutants are bound to be slightly different again an exact match would really surprise me. I'm not planning on getting my car before January 15th, if it happens, it happens, but I'm not planning on it. Keep watching that counter boys and girls! /fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/MWPX/tounge_smile.gif

POST 8Original post

Thanks BT & K-Man, I will be watching the counter. I just wish I knew when that first vessel is supposed to leave Europe. Does anyone know the name of the shipping lines? I heard it pronounced like Pachia or Patiia? Russ

POST 9Original post

Some cars are already at Port. They will be held there and shipped to dealers to coincide w/ Launch date of Jan. 14. There will be no hold ups due to EPA Certs. And there will not be an early release based on a nastygram. In can attest that a nastygram is the worst way to communicate with Porsche. You will get no where and they will remember (document) it. In fact they document every time they communicate with any customer on a one-to-one basis. The launch date is Jan 14, nothing more to 'worry' about.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.