fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

987 Cayman S Frunk & Boot switch

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH987 Cayman S Frunk & Boot switch

Leading reported evidence

Use tapatalk

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

Original post Read captured discussion
987 Cayman S Frunk & Boot switch
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use tapatalk' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use tapatalk' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use tapatalk

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

Original post Read captured discussion
987 Cayman S Frunk & Boot switch
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Hi all, So, I managed to brake my Frunk & Boot switch. I removed it today with the view of repairing it, but it won’t be possible. A new one has been ordered, but it was hard to find the exact new part. I was looking for 997.613.105.00, but I got 997.613.105.02. It looks the same and has 4 pins, but can you think of any reason why it won’t be compatible?

POST 2Original post

It could just be an updated or superceded part number. Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

POST 3Original post

yes, the last 2 digits are the revision number. My Cayman 's frunk switch had also broken like that (I swapped in the switch panel from my Boxster ), the "02" probably has a redesign of the frunk switch to make it stronger

POST 4Original post

You can ignore the revision number in most cases*. The higher the rev, the more recent it is. Sometimes there is an engineering improvement, but often it is just due to availability of components or it is made by a different OEM supplier. * if there are any exceptions or incompatibilities they should be noted in the most recent PET catalog for your model/year.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.