fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Gunk under the filler cap - Boxster - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHGunk under the filler cap - Boxster - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Run temp

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Haven't worried about it as I had done quite a few short journeys where it only just got to running temp but will definitely check it again next time I am out and after a good run to get her hot and racy!

Gunk under the filler cap - Boxster - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run temp' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run temp' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run temp

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Haven't worried about it as I had done quite a few short journeys where it only just got to running temp but will definitely check it again next time I am out and after a good run to get her hot and racy!

Gunk under the filler cap - Boxster - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Went to have a look at a gen 2 Boxster S today and noticed the following under the oil filler cap. Looks a little similar to images of head gasket failure. Anything to worry about or do they all do that.

POST 2Original post

Nothing to sorry about at all, not head gasket failure Take it for a good thrashing and it will disappear.

POST 3Original post

That is most likely just from condensation that collects on the filler cap during short distance drives and/or cold weather and forms an emulsion. I would keep an eye on it, it's nothing to be worried about unless there's drastically more emulsion on the filler cap the next time you check.

POST 4Original post

Looks exactly the same as I see on one of my classic cars which does very few miles and is, as said, condensation. S

POST 5Original post

The good news is these engines do not suffer from head gasket failure. That is it is quite rare. The bad news is what is more common is a crack in the head. However, what you are seeing is just normal condensation. That area is part of the engine crankcase atmosphere and it is the coolest place in this atmosphere so any water vapor in the crankcase fumes, and there is quite a bit of water, will condense there and in doing so capture some oil vapor and that muck is what you get. I've seen pics of it much worse than that. If you cannot drive the car around enough to get the engine hot enough the radiator fans come on -- or you drive with the A/C on and if you have to to keep the car windows free of misting/fogging you have to -- this means water builds up in the oil and you should consider more frequent oil/filter changes. When I had my Boxster's oil analyzed at around 4K miles after I bought the car (new) the oil had 7% water in it. I settled on 5K mile oil/filter services and the engine's been fine ever since.

POST 6Original post

I would say that this is condensation as well. We had a brand new 2001 boxster S in the family and it used to do this. It's an excuse to take it for a nice long drive to get rid of this ;-)

POST 7Original post

Got this too OP. Haven't worried about it as I had done quite a few short journeys where it only just got to running temp but will definitely check it again next time I am out and after a good run to get her hot and racy!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.