11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRSJ car care scheme
Leading reported evidence
Replace /rebuilding the engine and not the replacement unit itself
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
As I understand it, it would just cover labour for replacing/rebuilding the engine and not the replacement unit itself?
Leading evidence: 'Replace /rebuilding the engine and not the replacement unit itself' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace /rebuilding the engine and not the replacement unit itself' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
yes, but only OPC tend to just replace the engine, rather than rebuild, due to the high OPC labour cost (150 an hour vs 60)
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T003124Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Any body use this scheme?
http://www.rsjsportscars.co.uk/download/service-payment-plan.pdf
Any more info on the extent of cover.
Would it cover catastrophic problems like the dreaded intermediate shaft failure? Just looking for a bit of a peace of mind & a bit of protection for my investment.
This doesn't look bad value. Is this similar to the hartech 1?
http://www.hartech.org/lifeplan.html
Cheers
Adam
i did a bit of research about warranties a few weeks ago and there is a thread somwhere........RSJ is to very similar to the hartech one and obviously more convenient for those of us who live in the south. remember though, from memory both policies cover labour only but do include an annual service and labour for replacement of "consumables".
I guess the question is ...... how much labour is needed on a major breakdown? assuming the average service cost is £375/yr (£250 for minor service, £500 for major service) then I reckon that you get circa 10hrs per year labour cover (assuming £70/hr for labour and £80/month for the warranty) ...is it worth it? maybe somebody else can comment?
how many labour hours to recondition/fix a gearbox?
how many labour hours to recondition/fix an engine?
how many labour hours to replace a clutch?
maybe I am looking at it overly simply .. anybody got any views as to value for money of these policies versus a traditional warranty (which some indies also do e.g. J Z Machtech, G C Motors (provided you pay for your servicing with them)
I have just taken up the RSJ scheme, they have a very good set of guys there and Joel is spot on.
It gives me peace of mind as well as covering my service, much better in my view than the opc warranty...
Do you know what this would cover you for in the event of say an "itermediate shaft failure"?
As I understand it, it would just cover labour for replacing/rebuilding the engine and not the replacement unit itself? :?:
yes, but only OPC tend to just replace the engine, rather than rebuild, due to the high OPC labour cost (150 an hour vs 60)
Hence you would just pay for the broken parts, seals, lining etc
I posted a comprehensive reply answering the question raised about how similar our Hartech scheme was and correcting the misleading estimates showing how inexpensive it was etc together with several costings - but it has been deleted (which has happened with previous posting responses).
Can I suggest that it would be polite to inform me if and when you do this and why so I don't waste my time trying to help inform others and correct any missinformation others are posting about us.
Baz
I enrolled on the Hartech scheme, these were my thoughts at the time.
http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=44672
Haven't looked back, touch wood the car's running great.
Would make the same decision again today.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
