11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTurbo wheels
Leading reported evidence
Check back of the spokes
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check back of the spokes' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check back of the spokes' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm half looking for a set of turbo 2 wheels, seems that hollows are the choice for turbo owners but was interested to read that the first models into early 2001 had the solid type wheels found on the C4S cars. The hollows are a fair bit lighter aiding acceleration but probably not noticeable for most of us and seeing mine is was registered on Jan 1st 2001 would have been delivered with solids.
Hey, I'm "half looking" to switch out my standard 996 turbo wheels! :thumb:
My car is an April 2002 registered model, so hopefully should have the hollow wheels? How would I tell?
How much would you be willing to offer for them if they are the hollow version? :?:
Thanks! Only bought it a week or so ago and it needed quite a bit of TLC.
Still a few niggles to sort out, but it's going surprisingly well so far and the car is amazing to drive. :thumb:
Not sure where all the criticism about them being one dimensional comes from? I had a 996 C2 3.4 for 6 years before this and it feels like I need to learn how to drive a Porsche all over again! 8)
Maybe that's worth a thread in itself...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
