Planet-9

Springs question...

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSprings question...

Leading reported evidence

Check with the manufacturer

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Call H&R and ask, I doubt there is a lot of difference between the two, but best to check with the manufacturer to see what differences there are.
Original post Read captured discussion
Springs question...

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check with the manufacturer' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with the manufacturer' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check with the manufacturer

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Call H&R and ask, I doubt there is a lot of difference between the two, but best to check with the manufacturer to see what differences there are.
Original post Read captured discussion
Springs question...

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I just bought a set of springs from a member of this forum. Was looking to receive H&R sport springs for my CS (part # 54020) Instead I received H&R sport springs for the Boxster S (part# 29168 HA) Will this work? Is it wise to use this application on my CS? Or are they the same spring just different part #? Thanks!

POST 2Original post

Call H&R and ask, I doubt there is a lot of difference between the two, but best to check with the manufacturer to see what differences there are.

POST 3Original post

I agree with K-Man S, check and see because the stock suspensions of the two cars are different, including the springs. brad

POST 4Original post

Ok, The H&R tech told me that the springs are identical...in all aspects and that they work perfectly on my CS. According to their notes. On a relevant topic, will by H&R springs (1.4 - 1.2 drop in front and rear respectively) give me a raked look? my tires on my 20s are going to be 245/30/20 and 285/30/20...and that equates to the same diameter as my stock 19s with stock tires. Will my butt be higher? Noticeable? Thanks!

POST 5Original post

Good that the springs are identical. Do the springs they sell for the Cayman S have a different part number, I wonder? If so, I would wonder why... On the lowering: .2" is only 5mm, not too much difference, really. Will it be noticeable? I'm not sure, but I'd guess 5mm will be hard to spot. Good to see you got the right sized tires. brad

POST 6Original post

The factory springs between the Boxster and Cayman are NOT identical so I'm surprised H&R would make a one-size-fits-all solution there. Honestly I doubt the H&R springs are that much different from stock springs other than ride height to worry much about it, it isn't like you are going to aggressively track your car and are looking for suspension improvements.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.