11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHad my windows re-tinted: pics
Leading reported evidence
Check into the laws here in pa
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check into the laws here in pa' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check into the laws here in pa' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Eddie over there did a great job and I recommend him to anyone who's looking for tint work.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well I had to take tint off my front 2 windows to pass inspection and had them redone by Auto-Creations in Raritan, NJ. Eddie over there did a great job and I recommend him to anyone who's looking for tint work.
Anyway, took a few pics...hope everyone enjoys. The tint is 50% all around.
Now that's a nice looking car. You needed to remove a 50% tint for inspection? Wow. it does't look dark enogh to cause problems at inspection. Weird.
How much did the job cost?
FYI - tinting is usually pretty inexpensive. There is a very reputable shop near my office in Sherman Oaks, CA that only does tinting. I think they did my S500 for $180 and his quote for a Porsche was much lower than that. And this guy is a little higher than average for LA prices because he has such a strong reputation.
Thanks for the kind words guys.
Yeah over in NJ you won't pass if you have any degree of tint on your windows. It was $40 to take the 2 off and then $70 to redo them.
I think the shop normally charges around $200-230 for the car which is pretty normal around here. Plus Eddie has done other Porsches and Ferraris before so the quality of work is good.
I know in some other states, tint jobs can be had for $100-150.
It's a thin film that goes on the inside of the window. Normally comes in 50%, 35%, 20%, and 5%. Those numbers state the % of light that transmits through although I have also heard of people stating %s as the amount of light blocked.
I see a lot of tinted cars here in the Bay Area and in SoCal. Frankly, I hate black cars with a deep tint. Just the "mafia" look on them. Tint seems to looks the best on clean white cars
