fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

New track in California?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNew track in California?

Leading reported evidence

Replace walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But driving each track is probably different as you also have to take into consideration elevation changes, walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc..

Original post Read captured discussion
New track in California?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But driving each track is probably different as you also have to take into consideration elevation changes, walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc..

Original post Read captured discussion
New track in California?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

http://www.porscheownersclub.org/mbo...d=1736&posts=2

POST 2Original post

The road course looks the same as Buttonwillow.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Buttonwillow??? After reading your post, I looked at the road course map again. I don't see the similarities. How does it remind you of Buttonwillow??

POST 4Original post

take the map from the buttonwillow website and rotate it 90 degrees counter clock-wise and you have two very similar tracks. IMHO. But driving each track is probably different as you also have to take into consideration elevation changes, walls, blind corners, length of straights, etc..

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.