8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHamber indicators - production time frame
Reported or suspected cause
excellent platform
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
longer wheelbase and more rigid structure proved to be an excellent platform for the new suspension
Leading evidence: 'excellent platform' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'excellent platform' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust camshaft timing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
engine used four-valve technology with a new variocam system for adjusting the camshaft timing to
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
engine used four-valve technology with a new variocam system for adjusting the camshaft timing to
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
From the outside there is virtually no difference in appearance, other than the Carrera 4 engine
Question: does anyone know definitively when the amber light production was stopped on the 996?
I know they were stopped after 'about a year' but wonder if there is anymore exact information like a production date or chassis number?
The aim of my question is to allow the identification of a car that should and shouldn't have amber lights from factory.
Thank you, interesting, so is it correct to say that anything with a '99' vin number will not have them?
Hence late 1998 cars that carry a '99' vin would no longer have ambers despite being a throttle cable car?
Copied and pasted from an official doc I have:
History and Variants of the 996 Carrera
MY1998
The 996 was introduced to the world at the Frankfurt Motor show in September 1997. It was a
radical redesign of the 911 concept with a completely new body shell, and for the first time the engine
was water cooled. Designers Pinky Lai and Harm Lagaay produced a svelte new form which was
30mm wider and 173mm longer than its predecessor, the 993. Structural stiffness of the new
bodyshell was up by 45% in torsion, and 50% in flexure. Drag coefficient was down to 0.3 from 0.33,
and the extra internal dimensions gave the car a roomier and luxurious feel. But it remained instantly
recognisable as a 911. The 996 shared many components of the 986 Boxster, and the cars were
visually virtually identical from the nose to the 'A' pillar. The car was much cheaper to produce than
the 993, as a result of bringing in Japanese consultants to assist with production techniques.
The engine was also the same basic design as the Boxster, albeit enlarged to 3.4 litres. Emission and
noise regulations determined the unavoidable necessity for the new engine to be water cooled. The
engine used four-valve technology with a new variocam system for adjusting the camshaft timing to
produce an increase in torque and reduction of hydrocarbon emissions. The engine also featured
what can only be described as a 'semi-wet' sump, as the oil reservoir was incorporated within the
crankcase. Transmission was provided by either a manual 6-speed transmission manufactured by
Getrag, or a 5-speed tiptronic automatic gearbox supplied by ZF.
The chassis and suspension was the work of Carrera Project Manager Bernd Kahnau, with a
McPherson strut design at the front and a cast aluminium multi-link design at the rear corners. The
longer wheelbase and more rigid structure proved to be an excellent platform for the new suspension
arrangement.
On the inside the transformation was also extensive. Gone was the seemingly haphazard
arrangement of switchgear and instruments which had been carried over from previous models to the
993. A much more practical and ergonomic layout took its place, yet retained some of the trademark
Porsche features, such as the large central revcounter. The driving position improved with wider
spaced pedals which were more centrally mounted in the footwell. Water cooling also had a big
advantage in providing a far superior heating system, and a true climate control system was
introduced using a control system from Audi. The cabin was a much more refined place to be than
ever before.
MY1999
The cabriolet and four-wheel-drive Carrera 4 versions of the 996 were unveiled at the Paris Motor
Show in October 1998 for the 1999 model year. The Porsche Side Impact Protection System (POSIP)
was introduced,
as were clear indicator lenses front and rear to distinguish the car from the Boxster,
and to counter criticism of the 'fried egg' look of the front lights.
The cabriolet mechanism was fast,
and could lower or raise in just 20 seconds. Cabriolets came with a removable hardtop, colour-coded
to the bodywork. The cabriolet was around £6000 more to purchase than the Coupe equivalent.
The 4 wheel drive system was available for both Coupe and Cabriolet, and was nearly £4000 more
than the 2 wheel drive model. Various modifications to the front end were required to make room for
the front axle final drive, which resulted in a smaller front luggage compartment, and the use of a
deflated space-saver wheel under the floor of the compartment. The C4 was also available in tiptronic
transmission for the first time. Engine management was by Bosch Motronic 7.2, which introduced
drive-by-wire throttle control, often referred to as eGas.
The four wheel drive system added 55kg to the overall weight, but performance figures were quoted
identical to the C2 equivalent due to improved traction. The extra weight at the front end gave a
weight balance of 40-60, compared with 38-62 for the C2. The 4-piston calipers manufactured for
Porsche by Brembo were painted in a 'titanium' (silver) colour for the C4, as opposed to black for the
C2. Perhaps the most significant introduction on the C4 was Porsche Stability Management (PSM). To
quote the Porsche Service Information Document of the time: 'PSM is an active control system for
stabilising a vehicle at the limit of its driving dynamics capability. PSM includes functions such as ABS,
ABD, ASR (traction-slip control), EBV (Electronic Brake-force Distribution), as well as a longitudinal
dynamics control system MSR (engine drag torque control). In addition to this, the vehicle is stabilised
at the limit of its driving dynamics capability within the transverse dynamics control system by FDR
(driving dynamics control system)."
From the outside there is virtually no difference in appearance, other than the Carrera 4 engine
compartment badge, silver calipers, and a new design of 17" alloy wheels.
MY2000 & 2001
Changes for Model Year 2000 Porsche included the adoption of Motronic 7.2 (eGas) to all Carrera
models, and the option of PSM on C2 models, which had previously been offered with a basic traction
control system based on ABS 5.3. In 2001 the luggage and engine compartment lids became
electrically operated.
Wouldnt take for granted it's on its original lights as some amber lights would have been swapped out for clears for the more modern look and then more recently some would have fitted Amber's as they prefer the more retro amber look
Sorry I was a bit misleading there - I didn't mean the '99' in the VIN i just meant on a 1999 VIN year
Thanks Billy Bumpsteer, yes mine is an 'X'
Yes this exactly; hence wondering the cut off by VIN as mine being a throttle cable car on a 1999/X VIN, it is right on the cut off - a colour to sample car with clear lights
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.