fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
18 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHTo PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Use topaz

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed work

Replace (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It will need replacing (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line).

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use topaz' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 18 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Replace (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It will need replacing (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line).

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use sponge each time if you are worried

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I’d just get a bucket with a grit guard and use a new sponge each time if you are worried.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It will need replacing (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line).

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use sponge each time if you are worried

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I’d just get a bucket with a grit guard and use a new sponge each time if you are worried.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use topaz

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating.

To PPF or not - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I’ve bought a used 992 T . The car has over 4000 miles on it and is in bog standard white. A few small stone chips on the front bumper but nothing on the bonnet but it does have the carbon roof. I’m in two minds to have PPF applied. I’ve got PPF on a white Tesla and tbh I still have small stone chips ( car has covered 28000 miles ) and on the front bumper it has some of the PPF damaged and looks untidy. The cost is approaching £4000 for PPF with ceramic coasting. I’m thinking of just forgetting about it and enjoying the car and respraying later but my main concern is the carbon roof. I just can’t get my head around spending £4000 on a product that doesn’t even stop full on stone chips and looks untidy after a few years. People thoughts appreciated on this matter.

POST 2Original post

If the car has a few chips already I really wouldn't bother with ppf. If it's a new car then yes, it will protect it up to a point as you know with the Tesla. You'd be unlucky to get stone chips on the c/f roof, though of course not impossible. Save the £4k for a respray later.

POST 3Original post

gred said: If the car has a few chips already I really wouldn't bother with ppf. If it's a new car then yes, it will protect it up to a point as you know with the Tesla. You'd be unlucky to get stone chips on the c/f roof, though of course not impossible. Save the £4k for a respray later. I PPF'd the front end of my new R8 when I got it. First trip away, a stone hit the roof.....

POST 4Original post

No. It does protect, but not completely. It will need replacing (albeit maybe 8-10 years down the line). It never feels or looks quite right to me (but then perhaps I have only seen second rate jobs). And it costs more than a good front end respray.

POST 5Original post

JohnnyUK said: gred said: If the car has a few chips already I really wouldn't bother with ppf. If it's a new car then yes, it will protect it up to a point as you know with the Tesla. You'd be unlucky to get stone chips on the c/f roof, though of course not impossible. Save the £4k for a respray later. I PPF'd the front end of my new R8 when I got it. First trip away, a stone hit the roof..... I did the full front end of mine and ended up with a chip right on the edge of the PPF and one on the door which wasn’t protected. I think that I would still go for it on a newish car but only if it didn’t already have chips. Bumpers and bonnets seem to get resprayed on a regular basis so I’d leave it and then if it bugs you down the line, get it resprayed then and apply PPF

POST 6Original post

Other benefit of full ppf (with ceramic or not) is that you can wash it without any swirl marks or worry about paint at all. That is worth the price of entry for me as someone who cares but isn’t a competent home detailer!

POST 7Original post

Devilspoke said: Other benefit of full ppf (with ceramic or not) is that you can wash it without any swirl marks or worry about paint at all. That is worth the price of entry for me as someone who cares but isn’t a competent home detailer! I’d just get a bucket with a grit guard and use a new sponge each time if you are worried. If you wash it badly you’ll just swirl and discolour the ppf

POST 8Original post

Just get a decent detailer to ceramic coat it. It'll be a fraction of the cost of PPF, and work just as well.

POST 9Original post

I simply can't understand people paying more for PPF than it would cost to sort any paint out at a later date. Also, how much does your insurance go up every year if you have PPF'd your car? Some insurers can be really funny about PPF. No idea why, but they can.

POST 10Original post

Geoffcapes said: Just get a decent detailer to ceramic coat it. It'll be a fraction of the cost of PPF, and work just as well.

POST 11Original post

Geoffcapes said: Just get a decent detailer to ceramic coat it. It'll be a fraction of the cost of PPF, and work just as well. A ceramic coating is 1-2 microns thick, PPF varies from around 150 microns to 300 for the ultra defense films. Clearly a ceramic coating offers scant protection vs. PPF.

POST 12Original post

Ed.Neumann said: I simply can't understand people paying more for PPF than it would cost to sort any paint out at a later date. This is my take on it, too. It also looks dreadful when it starts to go, and can very easily take off bits of clear coat off when it is removed. I’m also not too keen on ceramic coating, either. I like wax and ‘keeping on top of it’, but for convenience I understand its merits. Machine polish to the extent necessary to correct any swirls, and from then on protect with a good wax every few months. Any swirls are easily removed thereafter with a very light polish.

POST 13Original post

ive had a front end ppf and front body wrap on my car. It did not stop a chip when a large piece of road was flicked up and hit the frunk cover and windscreen. But the piece was bige enough to crack my screen. Since then after 4 years of driving the wrap has done its job. Just removed it and had the car polished and it looks, frankly, brand new. 24,000 miles - mixed driving, track days and hill climbing. so if keeping the car long term I think it makes sense but for a 2 year ownership period it's a lot of money to drop.

POST 14Original post

kmpowell said: Geoffcapes said: Just get a decent detailer to ceramic coat it. It'll be a fraction of the cost of PPF, and work just as well. I know it's bonkers that people think a ceramic coating will protect a car from scratches and stone chips, easier to wash and shiny yes but that's where it ends.

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I’ve decided to leave it. I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating. What annoys me is when companies quote ££££ + Vat . Next step is ££££ + Vat + CT + NI . Anyway what did it in the end was seeing a 23 plate turbo cab in carmine red with PPF and I think 5000 miles which looked lovely but a huge stone chip glaring back at me on the bonnet.. I think I would have had to remove the ppf if I had that stone chip and repaint.

POST 16Original post

Chipper said: I’ve decided to leave it. I’ve used Topaz twice before but it was over £4K for front end and skirts and carbon roof with a ceramic coating. What annoys me is when companies quote ££££ + Vat . Next step is ££££ + Vat + CT + NI . Anyway what did it in the end was seeing a 23 plate turbo cab in carmine red with PPF and I think 5000 miles which looked lovely but a huge stone chip glaring back at me on the bonnet.. I think I would have had to remove the ppf if I had that stone chip and repaint. Like your username.

POST 17Original post

£4K!!!!!! Holy Sh!t Batman! If you're having a full body PPF then yeah but not for what is basically a track pack. I'd look elsewhere. As a guide, I paid £2k for a track package, including side skirts, PPF plus ceramic of all the paintwork plus wheels.

POST 18Original post

I put about 3-5k miles on my car a year - normally one Euro trip a year plus local thrashings. After 5yrs I have a few stone chips, small enough not to upset me, but you can just about see them when you wash it. I will pay about 1.5k - 2k for a front end respray and it will keep me happy for another 5yrs. I had it Ceramic coated when I got it, that helps make washing quicker and I don't wash it with a gritty sponge, so there are no swirl marks. Once washed it actually still looks new

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.