Planet-9

PCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Leading reported evidence

Install nav

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
So here is the question: Once I installed the Nav, everything works just fine.
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install nav' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install nav' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Install nav drive into my cs

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Last weekend I installed the Nav drive into my CS.
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install nav

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
So here is the question: Once I installed the Nav, everything works just fine.
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Install nav drive into my cs

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Last weekend I installed the Nav drive into my CS.
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM / Nav: To code, or not to code?

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I have searched for any reference to this and have not found anything, so I apologize if this has been covered to death, but.... Last weekend I installed the Nav drive into my CS. I already had the PCM and a Desion GW500 up and going. When I retro-ed the PCM I had to take the car to the dealer to get sound working (I have the Bose option with a CDC). When I did that (2 weeks ago) I went ahead and scheduled an appt for further programming anticipating the install of the nav drive a week later. So here is the question: Once I installed the Nav, everything works just fine. Do I really need to have the PCM programmed to acknowledge the nav drive. I know the simple answer is, "If everything is working, why worry about it". However, when I go into menu to check the software versions it also shows the status of the ancillary components in the MOST ring. Everything else says: Entered: Yes Found: Yes But the nav says: Entered: No Found: Yes So the long and short of it is, do I even need to bother with having it programmed or is there some small feature or advantage to be had from having it done? Thanks for the help!

POST 2Original post

If you want things like SC (if you have SC) to show up on PCM then yes you need to get everything squared away in PIWIS, if on the other hand things are working fine and you don't want/need anything else then I wouldn't worry about it for now.

POST 3Original post

Thanks for the info. That is what I suspected. As I do not have SC I wll just wait until I have to take it in for some other service item and have them take care of it then.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.