fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?

Leading reported evidence

Test (essential reading)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Funnily enough the M030 equipped car was thought surprisingly compliant compared to other modded cars in the 911&Porsche World suspension test (essential reading)

996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test (essential reading)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test (essential reading)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use saving

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I'm thinking I can use the saving to put new top mounts and bushes on, etc.

996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test (essential reading)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Funnily enough the M030 equipped car was thought surprisingly compliant compared to other modded cars in the 911&Porsche World suspension test (essential reading)

996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?

Use saving

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I'm thinking I can use the saving to put new top mounts and bushes on, etc.

996 C2 Cabrio Tip - Suspension refresh - Std to M030?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T033922Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all, I have a UK 2001 996 C2 Cabriolet Tiptronic with getting on for 90k miles on it, so a suspension refresh has been on my mind for a while and I'm thinking I'd like a slightly lower and firmer ride, so the M030 sports suspension kit looks appealing. Can anyone tell me if there is any difference between these individual dampers and springs and the ones in the official Techiqument M030 upgrade package? The upgrade package has the front and rear anti-roll bars with bushes, but it seems to be twice the price as buying the parts individually? M030 package: https://www.design911.com/Original-...on-Kit-Porsche-996-CABRIO-C2-AUTO/prod133223/ 996 C2 M030 Front and Rear dampers: https://www.design911.com/Bilstein-...rbers-PACKAGE-Porsche-996-C2-M030/prod130913/ 996 C2 M030 Front springs: https://www.design911.com/Coil-springs-FRONT-PAIR-Porsche-996-C2---C4---C4S---2001/prod141780/ 996 C2 M030 Front springs (US/Can models): https://www.design911.com/Coil-springs-REAR-PAIR-Porsche-996-Carrera-M030-Cabrio---Targa/prod142467/ I guess ultimately my question is, should I buy the dampers/springs individually and look out for a deal on the front and rear sway bar, rather than coughing up £1,700 for the full M030 kit? I'm thinking I can use the saving to put new top mounts and bushes on, etc.

POST 2Original post

Why do you want to stiffen up a Cabriolet with a tip box? What's your goal? I only ask because I think the standard suspension is better on British roads and making a Cabriolet into a track car is a lost cause. If that makes sense? I mean by all means go ahead and do it, but It seems an odd choice to me for a Cabriolet given their nature. They're supposed to be the pretty, open top cruisers that are super fun in summer, they're a bit soft torsionally to warrant M030 in my opinion and they weigh too much to be a track rat. But this is all just my opinion, and really it doesn't matter what I think at the end of the day it's your car of course. I guess what I'm trying to say is, why make a Cabriolet a teeth shaker? Because M030 is pretty brutal on certain surfaces compared to standard and the only place I've seen any real advantage to M030 is on circuit where its significantly better in my opinion than standard.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

That's a fair question. :thumb: The 996 is very much a high days and holidays car that I drive purely for fun. I have another car that is very practical and comfortable for all other purposes. I also come from a background of my only car being a heavily track prepared bone shaker of an Evo 8, that I routinely pushed beyond it's very capable limits on a regular basis. That car had zero body roll, even when being thrown around at speed. The 996 feels very soft in comparison, with noticeable body roll, so the M030 kit seemed like a natural upgrade.

POST 4Original post

Hi, I have M030 on my Cab along with so many other mods including my Super Charger, semi solid engine mounts etc. Yes, it looks pretty in summer but it has substance behind it too. I find the car drives well and not over bumpy at all. My aim was to make the car the best it can be, I don't track it. If you can, have a ride in a car with M030 and go from there to see if it's for you. Regards Vinny

POST 5Original post

Funnily enough the M030 equipped car was thought surprisingly compliant compared to other modded cars in the 911&Porsche World suspension test (essential reading) The USA/Can spec may not have the 10mm drop.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Some contradictory reviews then?! Anyone tried the M030 dampers with the H&R lowering springs? HR Springs seem to be softer than the M030 ones, but you get the lowered benefit plus firmer rebound from the M030 dampers?

POST 7Original post

Why not just try fitting the H&R springs with your existing dampers which are probably still OK at 90k, that way it will cost you £200-300 (if you do the work yourself) and you'll get a lower stiffer ride. Note that M030 may not drop your suspension at all as the original springs have probably dropped 10mm over time, at least that was the case with my C2.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the suggestion, I can't see that firming up the ride much though?

POST 10Original post

But not with the standard R&T springs, you need 40/90Nm or softer.

POST 11Original post

I would imagine that the H&R springs would be stiffer than standard, not sure if they are progressively wound though? Therefore the ride should also be firmer, but not so much to overwhelm the standard dampers if there are still in good condition (OEM dampers still tend to be at 90k according to comments I've read from folks who have had their shocks tested at Center Gravity).

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Interesting, thanks for the advice. :thumb: Is it possible to check the state of your dampers without taking them off the car?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.