fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Cayman internal designation ?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCayman internal designation ?

Leading reported evidence

Use pre-production well

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

's 'internal designation' generally refers to the factory reference used pre-production well before order forms, cars to sell or even the marketing name (e.g.,

Original post Read captured discussion
Cayman internal designation ?
Frequently discussed work

Use number designation

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sorry if this was discussed before but I have not seen anybody use a number designation for the

Original post Read captured discussion
Cayman internal designation ?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use pre-production well' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use number designation' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use number designation

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sorry if this was discussed before but I have not seen anybody use a number designation for the

Original post Read captured discussion
Cayman internal designation ?
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use number designation

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Sorry if this was discussed before but I have not seen anybody use a number designation for the

Original post Read captured discussion
Cayman internal designation ?

Use pre-production well

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

's 'internal designation' generally refers to the factory reference used pre-production well before order forms, cars to sell or even the marketing name (e.g.,

Original post Read captured discussion
Cayman internal designation ?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Sorry if this was discussed before but I have not seen anybody use a number designation for the Cayman S ie. equivalent of 996,997 for 911 or 987 for Boxters ?

POST 3Original post

The internal (PAG) development code name was C7.

POST 4Original post

I thought the Cayman S was C7S with the yet to be produced base Cayman presumably C7.

POST 5Original post

lizardS - you are correct...so much for speedy typing!

POST 6Original post

the internal designation, and it shows up on my order invoice is 987-120, just like my 2002 turbo was officially a 996-420 Brad

POST 7Original post

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr noshade="" id="quote" height="1" /> the internal designation, and it shows up on my order invoice is 987-120, just like my 2002 turbo was officially a 996-420 Brad <hr noshade="" id="quote" height="1" /></blockquote> Brad Porsche 's 'internal designation' generally refers to the factory reference used pre-production well before order forms, cars to sell or even the marketing name (e.g., Cayman ). I thought that was what euroboy was asking. Edited by - lizardS on 12/13/2005 6:22:42 PM

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.