15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThe best tranny choice, if it existed.
Leading reported evidence
Set stage - we all know
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To set the stage - we all know that there are different ways of building a manual tranny linkage.
Leading evidence: 'Set stage - we all know' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set stage - we all know' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Only downside I could think of (if I had to, first thing that comes to mind because of the porsche’s great tactile feedback) is that similar to electronic steering all the sensations would be gone and it’d be like using a racing sim.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Only downside I could think of (if I had to, first thing that comes to mind because of the porsche’s great tactile feedback) is that similar to electronic steering all the sensations would be gone and it’d be like using a racing sim.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is actually technically feasible but I HIGHLY doubt it would ever be seen. To set the stage - we all know that there are different ways of building a manual tranny linkage. You can have a linkage connecting the stick to the tranny or you can have it be cable operated. They're both "real" and have their own feel.
Now - what's happening with steering systems? They used to be purely a direct connection but the trend is toward electric steering. It's appearing more and more and the quality is ever increasing (from its initial vague feel to the current "pretty good" level). How about throttle? Used to always be a cable between your pedal and the engine. No longer the case. Now there's no direct connection - just a potentiometer that tells a servo how much to gas to let into the engine.
What's the conclusion? The solid connections of the past are being replaced by "drive by wire" and eventually "drive by light" technology. Could this happen as well with the shifter in a car? Sure.
Soooo - when we consider that the current SMG of
BMW
is simply a regular manual transmission with a computer controlling the shifts via servoactuators, we could easily envision a modified system. A car with a clutch pedal and a shifter that can be 100% controlled by the driver. But, in heavy traffic or if one isn't into hill work, the driver presses the AM button (Auto-manual) and the car takes over. All shifting done by computer, just as currently occurs in an SMG car.
In this way the driver could have the option of a REAL manual (not a paddle shift but the whole thing) when desired and a "not so great but better than nothing" automatic when desired. (DSG isn't known for being particularly good in fully auto mode).
This would be my ultimate transmission.
You found it offensive?
I guess I'm not really clear on what class of "these kind of threads" this merits inclusion within. Seemed like reasonable tech talk to me. Since Porsche doesn't yet have a DSG type of transmission it would seem like an acceptable object of conversation. Certainly more interesting than a troll post like "Is a Cayman just a rich man's Z?"
There are just too may "what if" threads. Wait till Santa Fe gets here, he will find lots of threads for you that have regurgitated the topic over and over and over.
In an attempt to cut the OP a little slack, him obviously not aware of the heated discussions about transmissions lately, I see your point.
I am personally not a big fan of the 'fly by wire' replacements to the mechanical connections. But if it were not for throttle by wire, we wouldn't have the traction control and
Sport Chrono
type features we have today.
Shifting by wire will eventually become standard as we see manufacturers switch to DSG, which will allow a driver to have most of the benefits of manual shift, all of the benefits or automatic shift, and then some. Since a computer is doing all the shifting anyway, shift by wire is almost necessary.
On the good old manual transmission, I can't think of any reason to add the expense and reliability risks of electrical controls. But only time will tell.
Nobody called you crazy, so chill. My point is that these kind of threads turn to boxing matches with same info regurgitated with pissing matches that follow.
Yes, you did.
Review your post. You included an icon of a dot person that's officially entitled "crazy" and for which the icon is indicating "he's crazy" (circling a finger around forehead - quite a universal gesture). I'd be interested in how you could suggest a different interpretation.
There's no need to suggest I chill, as you put it, btw. It implies I'm hot and bothered by your response (which I'm not). I didn't like your post and considered it rude but simply filed it as a single descriptor of your attitudes and opinions.
Chris R. vs. Interpol Round 11,
Daktarz, to answer your question, the best option and the only options that should ever exist is a 6 speed (or better) manual. There is no other answer...God has striken down all DSG, SMG or F1 technology as "evil sin". Those responsible for such technology will suffer for all eternity in hell.
Interpol has been sentenced to drive a direct drive scooter from now on.
* This response is to be interpreted as humour and not anything serious so don't bash me!
xoxox
Chris
Awesome idea.
Only downside I could think of (if I had to, first thing that comes to mind because of the porsche’s great tactile feedback) is that similar to electronic steering all the sensations would be gone and it’d be like using a racing sim. Bleh. If they figured that out that’d be the best of both worlds
Bumping ancient threads because was curious what people talked about back then / felt like sorting by old.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.